From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Why Does Pedantic Little Pansy-Ass Pussy Liberal HAVE To Try And Make Others Look Dumb? - So He Can Make Wittle Rich Boy Feel Better About Himself And His Fucked-Up Life
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 23:35:59 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Sun, 11 May 2025 13:00:31 -0700, Alan says...
>
> On 2025-05-10 22:35, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 10 May 2025 08:22:15 -0700, Lou Bricano says...
> >
> >> Some countries have turned to the satellite internet firm in
> >> conjunction with trade talks, STATE DEPARTMENT STAFFERS WROTE.
> >
> > Who?
> >
> > More "anonymous" sources... more fake news.
> I don't think anyone has heard of "QUIT Pro Quo", PusseyGurl...
I have... my macro wrote it.
LOL... Mr. "I Know It All Faggot Rich Kid", doesn't know I've used this term before...
... AND in the same article, dumb ass.
If I thought it was "quit pro quo", WHY would I have written this in the same article?
"You act like there's never been any quid pro quo in the history of the Democrat Party and Presidents."
https://i.imgur.com/l87YPxD.jpg
LOL... pedantic little pansy-ass pussy liberal HAS to try and make others look dumb, so he can make him feel better about himself
and his fucked-up life.
I thought it was quit pro quo, huh?
Date: 05/11/25 12:34 AM
"Reporters ignored the Ukrainians who claimed Joe Biden himself talked to them about quid pro quo arrangements."
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:02:16 -0500
"I guess maybe this is quid pro quo, seeing how NO ONE understands what YOU write, when you're trying to be "clever", but fail."
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:32:38 -0500
"pressuring citizens to join or contribute material/financial support. All material and financial contributions will be accepted
with the clear and unequivocal understanding that the inalienable rights of ALL will be protected without qualification or
exception. No Quid Pro Quo under ANY circumstances."
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 20:57:40 -0500
I do not remember any "do this or else" or quid pro quo.
I've only used the term:
Search Criteria, Containing text: "quid pro quo"
Found: 611 items (691.00 MB)
Text: 4,001 hits
Searched: 4,706 items (4.23 GB)
Checked: 7,872 items (15.50 GB)
> ...and it shows your level of education that that's what you think the
> phrase is.
And it shows your level of dumbassery, not knowing what macros can and can't do if the spell checker it uses doesn't have Latin
in its dictionary... yet. ;-)
> "quiD pro quo", doofus.
No shit, rich faggot narcissistic little boy.
So... you replied JUST to whine about spelling?
How liberal faggot rich kids think:
Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO
This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong
They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.
But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to explain:
They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem
For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences associated
with loss or failure," says Sharp.
"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as an inherent
character fault," he explains.
Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their screw-ups are
unforgivable.
"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the time, or
not even try or make it seem as if I am'" he says.
Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger
For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good leader
admits their mistakes.
"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being fallible tend
to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.
"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's pretty hard
to believe," says the psychologist.
(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)
"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.
Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm sorry but
I'll try to fix it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."
They Don't Value The Truth
(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)
For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.
"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a reality, is
that Alan doesn't value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.
Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value facts. When it
comes to the truth, the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"
"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.
Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will often reveal
whether facts or feelings will influence them more.
"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains. "Other people
make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an emotional person because
it just won't wear... you're talking different languages.