From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: It's Not Grifting At All, When There Are OTHER Satellite
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:39:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-05-12 22:05, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 19:14:30 -0700, Alan says...
>
>> 'A series of internal government messages obtained by The Post
>> reveal how U.S. embassies and the State Department have pushed
>> nations to clear hurdles for U.S. satellite companies
>
> "CompanIES"?
>
> If they're asking for "cleared hurdles" for MULTIPLE companies,
> what's the problem.
Look where you snipped the quote!
", often mentioning Starlink by name."
>
> As usual, Wipeyourassington Post with our newspaper is lying by
> omission.
>
> They left out the part about naming OTHER satellite companIES.
>
> They saying only, "often mentioning Starlink by name", is a lie by
> omission.
And you omitting this is...
"But they [the internal government messages] do indicate that Secretary
of State Marco Rubio has increasingly instructed officials to push for
regulatory approvals for MUSK'S SATELLITE FIRM at a moment when the
White House is calling for wide-ranging talks on trade."
> You think ANY of the countries involved never asked about OTHER
> satellite companies and Rubio simply refused to talk about ANY of
> the "others"?
>
> Riiiiiight.
>
>> The documents do not show that the Trump team has explicitly
>> demanded favors for Starlink in exchange for lower tariffs.
"State Marco Rubio has increasingly instructed officials to push for
regulatory approvals for MUSK'S SATELLITE FIRM at a moment when the
White House is calling for wide-ranging talks on trade."