From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Once Again, Liberals Post Shit That Are Basically Lies By Omission
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 08:02:15 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Sun, 18 May 2025 00:13:16 -0700, Alan says...
> > So... I do NOT have to present evidence.
>
> "have to".
>
> Of course not.
>
> But you're the one making the claim.
So? Give us us a solid reason you NEED me to present evidence, and I'll consider citing all my posts.
And WHY are you obsessing over me.
You ask exactly ZERO liberals to prove their article.
And I'm not a chicken shit like you. If I can prove someone wrong, I will do it, instead of asking the idiot to "prove" what he
posted is true.
Not listing a URL does NOT mean the article is false. That's just you playing your childish games.
If you think it's false, prove it.
You're just playing a game, because you look the shit up. EVERYONE knows it.
You're so easily figured out, stupid. There have been 100s of articles I didn't post a URL, but that didn't stop you from arguing
back. THAT proves you look up each and every article I post, through keywords and quotes or "other".
The ones you KNOW to be true AND have looked up, you ask for a cite or proof, not bothering to refute. The ones you think are
false, and looked them up and found rebuttal sites, you try to refute.
The selection of articles you try to refute tells us a LOT about what you're doing.
When you can't provide refutation, you play your little game of "no proof, it must be false" and "no cite or URL, or "No
evidence: no reason for anyone to believe you" it must be false.
You can fucking look it up. No games, faggot.
Be consistent.
If you can't refute, just shut the fuck up.
This is where THIS comes in: (SO apropos)
Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO
(if you can't refute something, WHY reply? Do you REALLY need interaction so badly, you act like a child? I guess so. You and
Rudy are two narcissists in a pod, where ANY interaction is better than none. Get help!)
This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong
They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.
But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to explain:
They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem
For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences associated
with loss or failure," says Sharp.
"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as an inherent
character fault," he explains.
Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their screw-ups are
unforgivable.
"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the time, or
not even try or make it seem as if I am'" he says.
Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger
For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good leader
admits their mistakes.
"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being fallible tend
to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.
"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's pretty hard
to believe," says the psychologist.
(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)
"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.
Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm sorry but
I'll try to fix it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."
They Don't Value The Truth
(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)
For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.
"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a reality, is
that Alan doesn't value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.
Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value facts. When it
comes to the truth, the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"
"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.
Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will often reveal
whether facts or feelings will influence them more.
"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains. "Other people
make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an emotional person because
it just won't wear... you're talking different languages.