From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: All Administrations Are Supposed To Be PERFECT, In Regards To Immigration... Right? - Is The Trump Administration The ONLY One "Guilty" of "No Due Process, Regarding Deportation?
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 23:54:07 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Wed, 28 May 2025 17:20:06 -0700, Alan says...
> > Unlike you... I have a need to be normal, and, as is my wont, watch
> > you freak out over shit that made you look stupid in the first
> > place.
>
> Posting the same information over and over is "normal" to you?
I've explained this to you, already... dumb ass. Just because YOU can't fathom what I do and why I do it (actually... others do
it too and you say nothing, so, now we know it's your obsession with me that forces you to reply and ask stupid questions), is
not a good reason for it to not be normal... so, yes... it IS normal.
=====
All Administrations Are Supposed To Be PERFECT, In Regards To Immigration... Right? - Is The Trump Administration The ONLY One
"Guilty" of "No Due Process, Regarding Deportation?
Nope.
Not even close.
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS PRIORITIZED SPEED OVER FAIRNESS in the removal system, SACRIFICING INDIVIDUALIZED DUE PROCESS in the
pursuit of record removal numbers.
=====
Reminder: Barack Hussein Obama deported more illegals than Trump
Speed Over Fairness: Deportation Under The Obama
When removing individuals from this country - permanently severing them from their homes, families, and community-which is more
important: fairness or speed?
The United States has a proud tradition of individualized due process. No matter who you are, everyone deserves their day in
court. This is especially important for immigrants, many of whom might qualify for prosecutorial discretion given their
considerable roots in the United States, but who will only get that consideration if a judge can review their individual case and
decide whether or not they must leave. This judicial review - a brief moment of individuality and impartiality within a system
that often ignores both - is critical. Yet alarming new evidence has surfaced that in 3 out of 4 removal cases this does not
happen at all.
Yesterday, the Migration Policy Institute ("MPI") released the report, The Deportation Dilemma: Reconciling Tough and Humane
Enforcement, on the Obama administration's immigration enforcement record. One of MPI's principal findings is that THE
DEPORTATION SYSTEM HAS DRAMATICALLY CHANGED over the past 19 years - moving from a judicial system prior to 1996, where the vast
majority of people facing deportation had immigration court hearings, to a system today of nonjudicial removals, ...
... WHERE 75 PERCENT OF PEOPLE REMOVED DO NOT SEE A JUDGE BEFORE BEING EXPELLED FROM THE U.S.
The numbers, are staggering: in 1995 - CLINTON, 1,400 immigrants were subject to NONJUDICIAL REMOVALS REPRESENTING, 3 PERCENT OF
TOTAL DEPORTATIONS. By FY, 2012 that number, had sharply increased, to 313,000 nonjudicial removals - an all-time high.
Under today's (May 1, 2014) removal system, only one quarter of all people facing expulsion get to present their case before an
immigration judge. These judges, employed by the Justice Department, are experts in immigration law. They conduct formal court
hearings where they hear live witnesses, review documentary evidence, and evaluate applications for immigration relief.
By contrast, NONJUDICIAL REMOVALS ARE FAST-TRACK PROCEEDINGS wholly controlled by the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"),
sometimes involving only a single border agent who acts as both judge and jury. Those facing nonjudicial removal have no lawyer
and no chance to appeal.
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS PRIORITIZED SPEED OVER FAIRNESS in the removal system, SACRIFICING INDIVIDUALIZED DUE PROCESS in the
pursuit of record removal numbers.
A deportation system that HERDS 75 PERCENT OF PEOPLE THROUGH FAST-TRACK, STREAMLINED REMOVAL is a system DEVOID OF FAIRNESS and
individualized DUE PROCESS.
===============================================================================
Unlike you... I have a need to be normal, and, as is my wont, watch you freak out over shit that made you look stupid in the
first place.
Obama good!
TRUMP BAD!, for doing the EXACT same things as other Presidents have done.
So, fuck your whining about "whataboutisms".
Sometimes, you just have to expose the hypocrisy 'round here. NO ONE was whining, like you liberals are doing now,
back when O B A M A was deporting more people than everr, AND doing it, as you would say, against OUR Constitution.
Here's another som'n som'n to whine about:
Justin Trudeau's Gestapo.
A 2018 report by the University of Toronto's International Human Rights Program found that between 2013 and 2017, at least 300
people were wrongly detained by the CBSA.
A 2020 report by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) found that between 2016 and 2019, the CBSA had mistakenly arrested
or detained at least 89 Canadian citizens or permanent residents.
(what's Trump up to... 3?)
According to data obtained by the CBC through an access-to-information request, the CBSA reported 145 cases of "erroneous
detention" between 2015 and 2020.
A 2022 report by the Globe and Mail found that between 2016 and 2021, at least 20 people were wrongly deported by the CBSA.
Total Detentions: The CBSA reports total persons detained annually. For example, from fiscal year 2015-2016 to 2023-2024, the
total number of persons detained varied significantly, from a low of around 1,600 in 2020-2021 (likely due to COVID-19) to a high
of over 8,800 in 2019-2020.
WOW!
That's a LOT of citizens being detained!
Compare that with Trump's ICE.
Gahead... whine, whiner.