From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They Came Questionably Legal, And Now They're Back Home
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 09:09:12 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:33:10 -0700, Alan says...
> > In the future, you stupid fuck... AFTER the Democrats find a way to
> > give amnesty and pardons to them. And don't think for one second
> > they weren't going to vote any way. There are PLENTY of towns,
> > cities, counties and states, that said they were going to allow it.
>
> Oh, look!
Oh look. Faggot doesn't want to look it up, for fear of finding out I'm right.
Like I've said before... you probably already DID try and look it up and found out I was right, THEN, whined I provided no
"support" for my "claim", just to make me look wrong, when you know I'm right.
Why ELSE did "Autopen Joe" open the borders?
My "opinion" is based on the FACT that Democrats NEED illegals (soon to be "pardoned") to ever get back into the White House and
gain other seats.
Look em up yourself, even though I know you already have!
=====
https://duckduckgo.com/?
q=what+is+the+consensus+as+to+why+the+biden+administration+opened+the+borders+and+let+millions+more+illegals+come+in%3F&ia=web
An answer can be found in an executive order that President Biden signed on the first day of his presidency. It reverses former
President Trump's memorandum that excluded undocumented immigrants from the decennial census that is used to determine how many
seats states will have in the House of Representatives.
Undocumented migrants tend to settle in Democratically controlled cities that have adopted sanctuary policies that protect them
from the threat of deportation, so ANY ADDITIONAL SEATS ARE LIKELY TO BENEFIT THE DEMOCRATS.
Biden claims that our "elected representatives have a responsibility to represent the interests of all people residing in the
United States and affected by our laws." If congressional representatives have a responsibility to represent undocumented
immigrants, though, why have they legislated statutory provisions that make them deportable? How is that representing their
interests?
To make asylum available to more asylum seekers
This may have been a reason to let asylum seekers into the country initially, but it should have become obvious very quickly that
our immigration courts could not adjudicate their asylum applications.
The immigration court already had a backlog of 1,290,766 cases when Biden began his presidency. The applications of new asylum
seekers couldn't be adjudicated unless they were taken ahead of the applications of asylum seekers who had been waiting a very
long time for a hearing. The average wait for a hearing was 811 days; this did not count continuances and other delays in the
proceedings.
According to TRAC Immigration, the growth of the backlog has been accelerating at a breakneck pace since the start of the Biden
administration, which has buried the immigration court in an avalanche of cases. As of the end of January 2024, the backlog had
3,363,667cases.
The immigration court has more than 700 judges and the administration has requested funding for 375 more. But the Congressional
Research Service (CRS) estimated in a July 2023 report that it would take 1,349 judges 10 years to clear the backlog, which was
only 1,979,313 cases when CRS made that calculation.
Moreover, the Biden administration isn't making any progress on reducing the backlog. So far in fiscal 2024, the immigration
court has received 844,333 new cases, and it only has completed 277,533. At that rate, the court would have to triple its number
of judges just to keep up.
https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4478371-why-is-biden-letting-in-millions-of-illegal-border-crossers/
> > And THAT'S why Trump says fuck you and doesn't give them due
> > process, especially to the criminals and those who didn't bother to
> > use "due process" to come here.
> You DO realize that Biden was actually deporting people faster than Trump has been...
Hahahahahahahahahaha!
Oh, look!
Some more unsupported bullshit!
LOL... even if "he" was (HE wasn't... e.g., "autopen"), "he" might have been processing "more", but he wasn't DEPORTING more, and
even if "he" was, he was letting in millions more.
100k out... 1 million in.
Whoo whoo!
> Because that is what your founding, most basic, law requires:
> That every PERSON gets due process.
Nope.
They never HAD this problem, so HOW could they have written a law regarding it?
The "person" or "persons" they were referring to, were Black ex-slaves and Indians. They NEVER wrote a law dealing with those who
crossed America's borders, ILLEGALLY!
So, stop you crybaby whining about this "person" bullshit... faggot.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."