Davin News Server

On 2025-06-01 4:26 p.m., Alan wrote:
> On 2025-06-01 10:32, Dave Smith wrote:
>> A GTA judge threw out gun charges against a black male because she 
>> thought he had been racially profiled by the cop. She thinks the cop 
>> did not think he was treating the suspect differently because of his 
>> skin colour but that he was influenced by his unconscious racial bias.
>>
>> The guy had been pulled over when the cruisers automatic license plate 
>> reader indicated the owner was facing drug charges in Toronto and his 
>> license was under suspension. While the driver was compliant, the cop 
>> held him for back up to search the car.  Apparently the cop was 
>> working under the stereotype that Black men are more susceptible to 
>> criminal behaviour.
>>
>> Well, son of a gun, the cop..... who is a dark skinned man himself, 
>> must have been right. The guy who was probably acting nice because he 
>> was already in enough trouble did have something to hide. He had an 
>> unlicensed rifle under the floor mat on the cargo area. Unless he had 
>> a PAL and the rifle was trigger locked or had the bolt and magazine 
>> removed, it was illegal.
>> The cop should get a commendation for his good spidey sense, not 
>> discredited for acting on good information.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/judge-tosses-seized-gun-over-racial- 
>> profiling-of-black-driver-cites-systemic-problem-inside-peel/ 
>> article_327458e9-c876-498b-8dd2-bba4eb97d5d2.html
> 
> '“Put differently, had the driver been, say, a White woman, I am 
> confident that Officer Gandhi would not have exercised his discretion to 
> handcuff and detain her in the back of his cruiser for over an hour for 
> the sole purpose of writing up a summons,” Mandhane wrote.'
> 
> I think the judge is absolutely correct on this.

I will agree that a young black man would be much more likely than white 
woman to have an illegal firearm in the car, especially when he is 
someone facing drug charges.   You can deny that if you want, but the 
fact is the cop was right. They guy did have an illegal firearm in the car.


> 
> And being of another darker-skinned phenotype doesn't in any way negate 
> the possibility that the officer could be biased to think that a 
> different phenotype is more likely to be a criminal.
> 
> Oh, and you left out this:

I didn't leave anything out. I commented on part of it and I linked the 
article.


> 
> 'On May 13, the accused motorist appeared via video in a Brampton 
> courtroom for an appearance, during which the briefest of trials 
> commenced. He pleaded not guilty to all of the charges, after which a 
> Crown attorney announced he would be calling no evidence. With that, a 
> judge acquitted the man on all charges. '

Since you accused me of leaving that out I suppose it is fair to point 
out that the court date where the judge ruled against the admission of 
the evidence was April 29. Since the charges were in relation to the 
illegal firearm in the man's car were based on the fact that they found 
the illegal firearm as a result of the search that she ruled to have 
been illegal, there was no evidence.