From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Why Can't Faggot Liberals Stop Putting Words Into Others' Mouths, Like They Do With Their Dicks And Boyfriends'?
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:38:13 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 16:13:40 -0700, Alan says...
>
> On 2025-06-01 15:36, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > Check Your Fact added the total number of nationwide encounters representing FY 2021 to FY 2024 to date and arrived at...
> >
> > ...10,680,891.
>
> You're the one who depend on its veracity.
"Depend"?
No.
If I find better, LESS left-leaning liberal, sites that are more up-to-date, what's you beef, beef-cake eater?
That I used Snopes does not mean I "depend" on them for anything. It was one of, if not THE first site I came across for my
particular search.
Lots of "fact-checkers" rush to fact-check things like this, KNOWING that the truth hurts you wingers. They want to be the first
to be "out-of-the-gate" and scoop the narrative and "change" it to THEIR wants and needs.
That is how we know "we" are telling the truth. When we DO tell the truth, and it hurts the "liberals' bottom line(s), out come
the far-left-loons to pooh pooh it and make sure you libtard Drag Queen idiots see an alternate narrative, so "you" don't vote
Republican some day.
Left-wing fact-checkers are all full of shit, who like to change the narrative. If Trump says there were 7.3 million illegal
"encounters" at the border, Snopes and all the other "fact" checkers have to jump on their high horses and disprove him, even if
he's off by ONE point.
It's not sad that they do this (it really is), it's more pathetic, that you liberals BELIEVE the bullshit coming out of these
"fact" checkers.
And they say liberals are more educated.
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
They never remember... the Democrat party is made up mostly of Blacks and Hispanics now, so that "most educated" moniker, means
only that their "WHITES" may be more educated.
Black colleges graduating students, means NOTHING. Their curricula doesn't hold a fucking candle to predominant and historically
White schools.
It IS sad that you fucks on the left believe and DEPEND on "fact" checkers, like Snopes. I'll continue to use them for numbers
only, but I'll always delete what they pontificate about, when they try to explain the numbers away.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."