From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Antarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:51:20 -0400
Organization: Eek
-hh wrote:
> YMMV; I see it as a translation of statistical scientific data to be at
> a simpler level that the nontechnical public can understand it.
You misspelled "Bullshit."
Statistically, a half century of failed predictions means one thing
and one thing only: It's crap. It's all crap. It's all baseless.
> FYI, the same thing happens when you go to see your Doctor and they
> discuss risks of things like side effects to you:Â they don't say "a N%
> probability", but instead use common language expectation terms like
> 'can', 'may', 'should(n't)', 'rare', 'very rare', etc.
If your doctor predicted side effects for 50 years without a single
one ever coming into being, that means he's speculating.
>> People have sailed from the Atlantic to the Pacific man times.
>
> Most of the time via Cape Horn, not
Not the topic. The northwest passage has been used many times, with
evidence going back to the Vikings.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5