From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Antarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire Predictions
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 14:05:22 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-06-04 13:51, JTEM wrote:
> Â -hh wrote:
>
>> YMMV; I see it as a translation of statistical scientific data to be
>> at a simpler level that the nontechnical public can understand it.
>
> You misspelled "Bullshit."
>
> Statistically, a half century of failed predictions means one thing
> and one thing only:Â It's crap. It's all crap. It's all baseless.
The predictions of newtonian mechanics weren't baseless, because we
later learned that there was more to it.
>
>> FYI, the same thing happens when you go to see your Doctor and they
>> discuss risks of things like side effects to you:Â they don't say "a
>> N% probability", but instead use common language expectation terms
>> like 'can', 'may', 'should(n't)', 'rare', 'very rare', etc.
>
> If your doctor predicted side effects for 50 years without a single
> one ever coming into being, that means he's speculating.
>
>
>>> People have sailed from the Atlantic to the Pacific man times.
>>
>> Most of the time via Cape Horn, not
>
> Not the topic. The northwest passage has been used many times, with
> evidence going back to the Vikings.
Cite, please!