From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They Came Questionably Legal, And Now They're Back Home
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:11:21 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 12:38:49 -0700, Alan says...
>
> On 2025-06-01 07:59, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 31 May 2025 14:13:17 -0600, Skeeter OG says...
> >
> >>
> >> In article <101dm9r$otr7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> On 2025-05-30 17:04, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:26:22 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> This is what happens when you rage-post while drunk, Pussey Gurl
> >>
> >> I guess YOU would know.
> >
> > He WOULD know more than me, since I'm pretty sure he's come home on a Friday or Saturday night and wrote here.
> >
> > I don't drink, so... he not only WOULD know... he's a liar.
> You SAY you don't drink...
>
> ...which is not the same thing, PusseyGurl.
I know... I WROTE that I don't drink.
===============================================================================
Liberals Always Get Caught By The Semantic Games They Play
Semantics is the use language to manipulate the meanings of words in order to achieve a desired effect on an audience. For
example when an angry liberal emails me and says, "someone should put a bullet in your head," I ask if that said liberal thinks
that it would be good if someone killed me and then said liberal emails me back crying about how he, "never said that!" Well,
this is semantics.
Yes, it is indeed true that said angry liberal never uttered the exact words, "I wish someone would kill you," but what else does
someone putting a "bullet in my head" imply? Still, to the liberal mindset, this liberal has never said anything as inflammatory
as wishing me dead.
This is precisely why it is so hard to argue with a liberal. No matter what they say, there is always some semantic argument that
they will make that allows them to claim that they never really said what they said. It is like nailing Jell-o to the proverbial
tree.
The examples of these semantic games played by liberals are numerous. Abortion is not 'murder" because even though an innocent
child is being killed in cold blood, they have come up with another name to call it. Formally declared wars are not "formally"
declared wars because liberals do not like the verbiage that was used to initiate the use of military force (i.e. war). According
to liberals, certain groups of people are not people (i.e. corporations) and said people are not entitled to their first
amendment rights because liberals refuse to call them people.
But on the other hand, labor unions, groups of people, had better be allowed their first amendment rights and then some or else
holy Hell will break loose. Conservatives are "NAZIs" because, even though Nazism stands for National Socialism and was practiced
by the National Socialist German Workers" Party, the word "socialism" is not uttered when saying the words "NAZI".
Therefore NAZI magically comes to mean "conservative" rather than left-wing, socialist, progressive moonbat.