From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: "Big Beautiful Bill" Massively Unpopular With Voters
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 18:37:03 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:21:26 -0700, Alan says...
These polls are used as propaganda tools. They don't deal in truth. At this
point, I don't know why they even BOTHER will polls. Trump's
not going anywhere. What good is a poll at this point?
They can screech, "IMPEACH", all they want. If they couldn't get him impeached
before after doing some questionable things, HOW can they
impeach him now? WHAT has he done that's an impeachable offense?
Deport ILLEGALS without due process? Hell... EVERY President has done that,
since they started deporting ILLEGALS.
I've already proven that.
> Yeah the usual suspects around here - Bradley, Lying Lee, Siri and the
> endless version of the moron Rudely simply can't deal in facts.
> The facts are there...
>
> ...and they don't look good for you MAGAts:
Trump is still the President and that bodes ill for you FAGAts.
> "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling -
> immigration issues?"
>
> 54% disapprove.
>
> Read the poll for yourself:
Why?
"So since you believe polls are 'NOT factual'...
... how is it you're using the results of polls as "proof" that anyone
cheated? - Alan "Rich Boy" Baker
That's not a quote of mine. - Alan "Ski Bunny " Baker
Uhhh... yes it is, lying rich kid.
https://i.imgur.com/M9fxn3t.png
"Reality isn't decided by a poll." - Alan "Stalker" Baker
https://i.imgur.com/6S5l7Bi.png
HOW bad are polls at being "scientific"?
On Fri, 31 May 2024 14:32:47 -0700, Alan says...
"In a poll done BEFORE his conviction."
And AFTER his convictions?
He still won, butthurt, faggot. Ahhh... love the double entendres.
> .edu
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah... I bet ANY polling entity with ".edu" in the URL is going to get their
polling from an even number of "Conservatives to Liberals" and "Republicans to
Democrats".
How do we KNOW who made up the people taking the poll? What if the majority of
Republicans/Conservatives simply refused to take the poll and .edu was left
with an unequal number, favoring the far-left-loons who are BLM/Drag
Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/
Insurrectionist/Liberal Democrats?
These pollsters ALWAYS lead those on either side with a description of what
THEY think Trump is doing wrong BEFORE the questions are even asked.
Trump is separating families"...
... Trump is putting kids in cages...
... Trump is arresting and deporting people without due process, which goes
against...
... many people Trump is trying to round up, have been in The United States
for X number of years and have led fruitful lives, having children and...
So, by the time the question...
"Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling -
immigration issues?"...
... comes around, MOST people WOULD have reservations in saying "yes, I
approve"... even those on the right.
What these far-left Drag-queen, Palestinian and Hamas-loving pollsters always
do on their websites, is leave out the ENTIRE contents of what was said and
asked of the people taking the poll.
THIS .edu poll is probably NO different.
If YOU had an once of intelligence and a sliver of integrity, you'd admit
this, because the tricks these pollsters use, have been documented MANY times.
Look it up, lazy faggot.
==============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has
been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and
reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the
Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The
president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from
reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk
opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made,
TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. -
that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early
2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the
acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of
George W. Bush."