Davin News Server

On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:27:10 -0700,  Alan says...  

> > Nope.  The cellphone version starts with him pushing forward then gets
> > shoved back.
> 
> No. It does not. It doesn't show a single frame of him moving toward Noem.
>

Yes, it do too.
 
> That's a fact.

No it's not.

That's your fucking OPINION, because you don't REALLY know what Padilla would have done, had he 
been let go and the chairs not there.

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

LOGIC, which your Simp ass doesn't seem to grasp, dictates, that Padilla was wanting to go back to 
what he was doing, hence the, "I have questions for the Secretary."

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

You can PLAINLY see where he was struggling to get to. You can see Noem in the background and 
simple geometry dictates, it was the direction Padilla was trying to LUNGE back to.  

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

The ONLY reason YOU say he wasn't lunging "at Noem", is because the only way to get close to her is 
to go back to where he was, ONLY because there were chairs in the way.

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

If those chair hadn't been there, he WOULD have been lunging directly at her.

https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4

You can say he was going back to where he was standing all you want... that's only half the truth. 
Left to his own devices, he would have gone straight past where he was standing and going at Noem.

Yes, that's MY opinion, but are you claiming he would have gone back to the same place he started 
from, like he had a marker on the floor and would be moving to it like a child in a play?

Riiiiiight.

You can play all the bullshit childish liberal Simp games all you want, Simp... the Simple truth is 
that he was lunging back to "where he was standing" ONLY because there were chairs in the way of 
him going directly at her.

Do you really think we're stupid enough to buy it, that Padilla would have gone back to the same 
place he was standing?

El nope', cuck.

Most REAL men would have their arms around the girl, to have your picture taken.

LOL

PLONK!

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven 
effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 
2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's 
every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a 
distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from 
liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would 
suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do 
or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the 
idea of Trump as president was 
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late 
conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of 
paranoia in otherwise normal people 
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."