From: Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Padilla Recounts The HORRIBLE Ordeal He Had To Suffer...
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 02:36:56 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <103ks9s$3opqm$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-06-26 18:24, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:27:10 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >>> Nope. The cellphone version starts with him pushing forward then gets
> >>> shoved back.
> >>
> >> No. It does not. It doesn't show a single frame of him moving toward Noem.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, it do too.
> Nope.
>
> >
> >> That's a fact.
> >
> > No it's not.
>
> Sorry, but it really is.
>
> >
> > That's your fucking OPINION, because you don't REALLY know what Padilla would have done, had he
> > been let go and the chairs not there.
> >
> > https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4
> >
> > LOGIC, which your Simp ass doesn't seem to grasp, dictates, that Padilla was wanting to go back to
> > what he was doing, hence the, "I have questions for the Secretary."
> >
> > https://i.imgur.com/xfGJCaD.mp4
> >
> > You can PLAINLY see where he was struggling to get to. You can see Noem in the background and
> > simple geometry dictates, it was the direction Padilla was trying to LUNGE back to.
>
> There's no doubt that he was resisting being removed...
>
> ...but no evidence that he was ever acting in an aggressive manner by
> moving towards Noem.
He was wrong and you can't deny that.