Davin News Server

On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

>Alan wrote:
>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>
>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>
>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>> abuse of power."
>>>
>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>> said on Friday.
>>>
>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>
>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>
>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits- 
>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>
>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>> 
>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it 
>> right?
>> 
>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>> 
>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one 
>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>> 
>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>
>Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.

This is clearly lost on Alan.