Davin News Server

The Nature Of The Left
June 29, 2025
https://blog.reaction.la/politics/the-nature-of-the-left/

The Maga right is a big tent that welcomes outsiders. The left vigorously
polices purity. The left is forever holiness spiraling to ever greater evil,
malice, viciousness, and depravity, and has been doing so since the late
eighteenth, early nineteenth, century.

What Maga is doing is politics as one would expect politics to function in a
democracy or a republic, if democracy or republicanism was actually working
as advertised. You try to build a coalition that is big enough to take
power. What the Maga right is doing is politics, politics as theory
describes republics and democracies as function. What the left is doing is
the opposite of what theory says politics is. And it has been doing the
opposite of what politics is supposed to be for more than two centuries,
with immense success.

When the holiness spiral runs fast, the state self destructs, so the
survivor is the one that holiness spirals the slowest, which was England and
America. But inevitably the holiness spiral runs faster and faster.

Democracy became popular among elites following the failed revolutions of
1848 -- "the springime of nations". Back then leftism was nationalist, and
rightism was anti nationalist. And leftism continued to be nationalist all
the way to the end of World War I, and has not entirely ceased to be
nationalist, as for example Ukrainian Nazism.

Democracy became popular among elites because the mass media emerged, and
elites have always managed the mass media. From the beginning, democracy was
fake. It was uniparty democracy. Two parties disputing a fake issue, and
whichever party gets elected, no matter what issues it campaigned on, it
always winds up implementing the leftism of the inner party. The left party
is the inner party, and the right party is the outer party. Sometimes the
outer party is permitted to implement right policy on some matter, but only
when the left is abandoning that leftist program to focus on some new
shinier program. Thus for example in the Reagan/Thatcher era, redistribution
had gone far, far, far beyond the Laffer limit, and the elite, recognising
this, decided to back off from redistribution, and focus on the much shinier
program of the destruction of marriage and family, which had already been
under way since the late sixties. So Reagan and Thatcher were permitted to
win, and permitted to back off from destructive redistribution towards the
Laffer limit -- conditional on the destruction of marriage and family going
full speed ahead, and mass migration going full speed ahead.

Back in the 1930s, when Hitler was elected, the inner party in America
decided to abandon the destruction of marriage and family in favor of the
destruction of capitalism, for the destruction of marriage and family makes
a nation militarily weak, while socialism, by making it able to temporarily
tax far above the Laffer limit, makes it temporarily strong. Then in the
1960s, the destruction of marriage and family resumed. Which has now hit its
limit, with most men incel and all women whores, so the young and energetic
left are now refocusing back on the destruction of capitalism, while the
older gerontocratic left are still focused on antinationalism (except for
the Ukraine), mass illegal immigration, the destruction of beauty and art,
stamping out the faint echoes of family and marriage, and men in women's
sports.

When the internet emerged it was a new mass medium, and because of its
newness, the elite had no means of controlling it. It was dominated by
hackers and the hacker ethic, and what later became known as the alt right
emerged, a version of rightism that was no longer under the thumb of the
inner party.

Very soon, a big effort to bring it under control emerged, with a storm of
shills and shilling. Since Usenet had no moderation mechanism, by 2010 or
so, shilling destroyed Usenet.

 From then on, the left owned the internet, and set about destroying open
source, systematically cancelling and deplatforming anyone attempting to
resist this. As they destroyed open source, various voices defending open
source cried out, and were then silenced, the only major namefag surviving
being Lunduke.

However the destruction of gaming and movies met with more resistance,
because of the huge base of passionate fans, and now that the iron hand of
censorship has been somewhat eased in you tube, we see an explosion of
"rightist" content -- the "rightists" being leftists who breathed in leftism
in school and from the media, but did not like it when they saw their
beloved games and movies being destroyed. Asmongold was and is a gaming
journalist. He has no real interest in politics, but politics is interested
in his beloved games, and so became interested in him.

"Rightists", non uniparty rightists, now dominate the internet, the
overwhelming majority of them having no right wing ideology at all, just
incoherent fragments of left wing ideology. They became "rightists" because
marked for destruction by the holiness spiraling left, and so wound up as
part of the big tent Maga coalition.

The vast majority of those in the Maga coalition have not a thought in their
head, except thoughts planted there by leftism. But always, the ideas of men
with ideas are filling the vacuum. That is the alt right. And the alt right
itself is incoherent and overrun with enemy shills. Within the alt right,
there is the Dark Englightenment.

Nature abhors a vaccuum. Hot radioactive power is falling into the street
for someone to pick it up. The left has an organised centralised state
funded program to pick it up under the banner of socialism and opposition to
"oligarchs" -- the greatest and most powerful oligarch of them all being the
tech prophet Elon Musk.

The "oligarchs" don't like that, but don't have a coherent belief system to
oppose the enemy belief system.

Calling them "oligarchs" is true in the sense that they have a lot of power
and a far too intimate connection to the state -- but grossly deceptive and
false in that before 2024 they followed a policy of humble acquiescence to
official leftism, which acquiescence nearly led to their destruction, as
they acquiesced to the whims of those who hated them and wished them gone,
and after 2024 a policy of humble acquiescence to Trump.

Trump is facing enemies without and enemies within. Is an FBI director who
looks us straight in the eye and tells us Epstein killed himself -- safe to
have in charge of men with guns? If Trump is to win, if the "oligarchs" are
to keep what they have, they need men of a counter faith to leftism. As
Putin finally realised, you have to bring a gun to gunfight, and a faith to
a holy war.