From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:51:34 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits-
>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it
>>>>> right?
>>>>>
>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>>>>>
>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one
>>>>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>
>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>> injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
>>>
>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>
>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled during
>> Obama's years.
>
> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it. I'm asking
> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
> like this, you should be able to support it.
Notice the little goalpost move...
>
> Also note that the Obama didn't challenge nationwide orders as Trump
> did.