From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:18:43 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 6/28/25 00:35, Anonymous wrote:
> Alan wrote:
>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>
>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>
>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>> abuse of power."
>>>
>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>> said on Friday.
>>>
>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>
>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>
>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-
>>> limits- colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>
>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>
>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News
>> to get it right?
>>
>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE
>> injunctions.
>>
>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an
>> injunction in one part of the country that doesn't apply in other
>> parts of the country...
>>
>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>
> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
> injunctions.
So what? Are you making an "absence of evidence" type of argument, or
can you cite where Congress specifically restricted the authority of
said lower Federal courts to only apply within their district?
> The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
Time will tell.
-hh