Davin News Server

On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 23:17:40 -0000 (UTC), Dhu on Gate wrote:

> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:22:30 -0400, -hh wrote:
> 
>> On 7/1/25 13:51, Alan wrote:
>>> On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved
>>>>>>>>> to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions,
>>>>>>>>> something that had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a
>>>>>>>>> "colossal abuse of power."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months,
>>>>>>>>> we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to
>>>>>>>>> overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the
>>>>>>>>> American people from getting the policies that they voted for in
>>>>>>>>> record numbers,"
>>>>>>>>> Trump said on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the
>>>>>>>>> law for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases
>>>>>>>>> before them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower
>>>>>>>>> courts to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though
>>>>>>>>> the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply
>>>>>>>>> to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-
>>>>>>>>> limits-
>>>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox
>>>>>>>> News to get it right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE
>>>>>>>> injunctions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an
>>>>>>>> injunction in one part of the country that doesn't apply in other
>>>>>>>> parts of the country...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such
>>>>>>> nationwide injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was
>>>>>>> correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled
>>>>> during Obama's years.
>>>>
>>>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it.  I'm asking
>>>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>>>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>>> 
>>> Notice the little goalpost move...
>> 
>> Precisely.  Because a "zero" can't logically be proven, the burden for
>> disprove Alan's "zero" is by NoBody showing instances where they've
>> made an objection in the past (e.g. Obama administration).
>> 
>> It only takes one such example to disprove Alan, but citing a handful
>> of examples would make for a stronger case by revealing a pattern of
>> consistency in position, instead of an isolated anomaly.
> 
> You'd differentiate 'tween a stupid agenda and simply stupid, aye?
> 
> In this case I'd suggest there's some KISA involved, so no KISS ;')

ko-rection: KISAss

> 
> Dhu
> 
> 
>> 
>> -hh
> 
>  --
> Je suis Canadien:
>   Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais, C'est une esp`ece de sauvage.
>   Ne obliviscaris: vix ea nostra voco!
> 
>  *A mari ad mari ad mari*
> 
>   Duncan Patton a Campbell





-- 
Je suis Canadien:
  Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais,
  C'est une esp`ece de sauvage. 
  Ne obliviscaris: vix ea nostra voco!

 *A mari ad mari ad mari*

  Duncan Patton a Campbell