Davin News Server

Dhu on Gate wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 23:17:40 -0000 (UTC), Dhu on Gate wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 14:22:30 -0400, -hh wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/1/25 13:51, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved
>>>>>>>>>> to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions,
>>>>>>>>>> something that had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a
>>>>>>>>>> "colossal abuse of power."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months,
>>>>>>>>>> we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to
>>>>>>>>>> overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the
>>>>>>>>>> American people from getting the policies that they voted for in
>>>>>>>>>> record numbers,"
>>>>>>>>>> Trump said on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the
>>>>>>>>>> law for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases
>>>>>>>>>> before them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower
>>>>>>>>>> courts to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though
>>>>>>>>>> the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply
>>>>>>>>>> to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-
>>>>>>>>>> limits-
>>>>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox
>>>>>>>>> News to get it right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE
>>>>>>>>> injunctions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an
>>>>>>>>> injunction in one part of the country that doesn't apply in other
>>>>>>>>> parts of the country...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such
>>>>>>>> nationwide injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was
>>>>>>>> correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled
>>>>>> during Obama's years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it.  I'm asking
>>>>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>>>>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>>>>
>>>> Notice the little goalpost move...
>>>
>>> Precisely.  Because a "zero" can't logically be proven, the burden for
>>> disprove Alan's "zero" is by NoBody showing instances where they've
>>> made an objection in the past (e.g. Obama administration).
>>>
>>> It only takes one such example to disprove Alan, but citing a handful
>>> of examples would make for a stronger case by revealing a pattern of
>>> consistency in position, instead of an isolated anomaly.
>>
>> You'd differentiate 'tween a stupid agenda and simply stupid, aye?
>>
>> In this case I'd suggest there's some KISA involved, so no KISS ;')
> 
> ko-rection: KISAss
> 
>>
>> Dhu
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>>   --
>> Je suis Canadien:
>>    Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais, C'est une esp`ece de sauvage.
>>    Ne obliviscaris: vix ea nostra voco!
>>
>>   *A mari ad mari ad mari*
>>
>>    Duncan Patton a Campbell
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
alan likes to lunge and deny it