From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 12:18:40 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:51:34 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits-
>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it
>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one
>>>>>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>
>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>>> injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
>>>>
>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>
>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled during
>>> Obama's years.
>>
>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it. I'm asking
>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>
>Notice the little goalpost move...
Not a goalpost move at all. You can't prove a negative. Your failure
to show y position during the Obama years is so noted.
>
>>
>> Also note that the Obama didn't challenge nationwide orders as Trump
>> did.
>
Silence