From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:29:19 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-02 09:18, NoBody wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:51:34 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits-
>>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it
>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one
>>>>>>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>>>> injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>>
>>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled during
>>>> Obama's years.
>>>
>>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it. I'm asking
>>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>>
>> Notice the little goalpost move...
>
> Not a goalpost move at all. You can't prove a negative. Your failure
> to show y position during the Obama years is so noted.
You moved it from me saying you didn't object to insisting I show you
"cheered" it.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Also note that the Obama didn't challenge nationwide orders as Trump
>>> did.
>>
>
> Silence
How about because he respected the rulings of FEDERAL courts.