From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 21:55:28 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-02 19:04, Anonymous wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>> On 6/28/25 00:35, Anonymous wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>
>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>
>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>
>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-
>>>>> limits- colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>
>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>
>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News
>>>> to get it right?
>>>>
>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE
>>>> injunctions.
>>>>
>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an
>>>> injunction in one part of the country that doesn't apply in other
>>>> parts of the country...
>>>>
>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>
>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>> injunctions.
>>
>> So what? Are you making an "absence of evidence" type of argument, or
>> can you cite where Congress specifically restricted the authority of
>> said lower Federal courts to only apply within their district?
>
> Then why are lower federal courts, which only exist at the whim of
> Congress,
> divided up into districts?
Because people live in different parts of the country.