Davin News Server

On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:29:19 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>On 2025-07-02 09:18, NoBody wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:51:34 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits-
>>>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it
>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one
>>>>>>>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>>>>> injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled during
>>>>> Obama's years.
>>>>
>>>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it.  I'm asking
>>>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>>>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>>>
>>> Notice the little goalpost move...
>> 
>> Not a goalpost move at all.  You can't prove a negative.  Your failure
>> to show y position during the Obama years is so noted.
>
>You moved it from me saying you didn't object to insisting I show you 
>"cheered" it.
>

Once again you can't prove a negative.  If you would like to claim my
position on something, you're welcome to cite it.

>> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also note that the Obama didn't challenge nationwide orders as Trump
>>>> did.
>>>
>> 
>> Silence
>
>How about because he respected the rulings of FEDERAL courts.

What rulings of FEDERAL courts has Trump ignored?  Honestly given that
the Supreme Court has ruled that Federal Courts can't make nationwide
injunctions yet continue to do so, perhaps it's time that he did.