Davin News Server

On 2025-07-03 06:39, NoBody wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:29:19 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-07-02 09:18, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:51:34 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>>>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>>>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>>>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>>>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>>>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>>>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>>>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>>>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>>>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>>>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>>>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits-
>>>>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it
>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one
>>>>>>>>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>>>>>> injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled during
>>>>>> Obama's years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it.  I'm asking
>>>>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>>>>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>>>>
>>>> Notice the little goalpost move...
>>>
>>> Not a goalpost move at all.  You can't prove a negative.  Your failure
>>> to show y position during the Obama years is so noted.
>>
>> You moved it from me saying you didn't object to insisting I show you
>> "cheered" it.
>>
> 
> Once again you can't prove a negative.  If you would like to claim my
> position on something, you're welcome to cite it.

Why don't you show where you ever ONCE objected.

> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also note that the Obama didn't challenge nationwide orders as Trump
>>>>> did.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Silence
>>
>> How about because he respected the rulings of FEDERAL courts.
> 
> What rulings of FEDERAL courts has Trump ignored?  Honestly given that
> the Supreme Court has ruled that Federal Courts can't make nationwide
> injunctions yet continue to do so, perhaps it's time that he did.

What courts have "continue[d] to do so" after the USSC ruling?