Davin News Server

On Sun, 06 Jul 2025 09:28:44 -0400, NoBody wrote:

> On Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:49:15 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 09:30:01 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2025-07-04 06:08, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:55:00 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2025-07-03 06:39, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:29:19 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-07-02 09:18, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:51:34 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-01 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:14:17 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-06-28 06:21, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-06-27 10:20, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judges can no longer abuse their power:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions, something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had impacted his executive orders.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The president held a news conference just over an hour after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruling was issued and said the Supreme Court had stopped a "colossal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abuse of power."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers," Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump also accused lower court judges of trying to "dictate the law
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the entire nation" rather than ruling on the cases before them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, Supreme Court Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-supreme-court-limits-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> colossal-abuse-power-federal-judges
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Count down for Lying Lee and Bradley's whining commences.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow. You read poorly. Or perhaps it's just that you trusted Fox News to get it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The USSC only said federal district courts can't issue NATIONWIDE injunctions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And how is it a "win for democracy" that a court can grant an injunction in one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the country that doesn't apply in other parts of the country...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...operating under the same federal laws?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> injunctions. The Supreme Court's majority opinion was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is clearly lost on Alan.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not lost on me that you didn't object when they were ruled during
>>>>>>>>>>> Obama's years.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quote me and include the message ID's where I cheered it.  I'm asking
>>>>>>>>>> the same thing as Anonymous because if you're going to make claims
>>>>>>>>>> like this, you should be able to support it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Notice the little goalpost move...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not a goalpost move at all.  You can't prove a negative.  Your failure
>>>>>>>> to show y position during the Obama years is so noted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You moved it from me saying you didn't object to insisting I show you
>>>>>>> "cheered" it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once again you can't prove a negative.  If you would like to claim my
>>>>>> position on something, you're welcome to cite it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you show where you ever ONCE objected.
>>>> 
>>>> Once again you're asking me to prove a negative.  Just because I
>>>> haven't posted on something doesn't mean I approve of it.
>>>
>>>You really haven't studied logic, have you?
>>>
>>>I'm asking you to DISPROVE a negative.
>>>
>>
>>Not posting something does not imply approval nor disapproval  of a
>>policy.  You're still asking the same thing in a slightly different
>>way.
>>
>>>> 
>>>> You've lost completely on this point.  I think it's time for you to
>>>> admit and move along.
>>>
>>>Irony.
>>
>>I see you are unable to understand basic logic.
> 
> <crickets.wav>

Alan is a creature that has allowed the RulZ(TM) to replace 
conscience.  If it's an AI we need to Kill it before it grows up.

Dhu

   -- 
Je suis Canadien:
  Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais,
  C'est une esp`ece de sauvage. 
  Ne obliviscaris: vix ea nostra voco!

 *A mari ad mari ad mari*

  Duncan Patton a Campbell