From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 15:57:47 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-04 09:08, NoBody wrote:
> "If the Supreme Courtâs near-ban on nationwide injunctions was the
> earth-shattering victory President Donald Trump claimed, no one seems
> to have told his courtroom opponents.
>
> While the absence of that tool is clearly a sea change for the
> judiciary, early results indicate that judges see other paths to
> impose sweeping restrictions on government actions they deem unlawful.
> And those options remain viable in many major pending lawsuits against
> the administration.
>
> Since the high courtâs ruling last Friday, U.S. District Judge
> Randolph Moss issued an extraordinary rejection of the presidentâs
> effort to ban asylum for most southern border-crossers, a ruling with
> nationwide effect."
>
> https://www.yahoo.com/news/judges-still-broadly-blocking-
> trump-202312490.html
>
> "A federal judge in New York blocked the Trump administration from
> ending deportation protections for Haitians ahead of the date set
> under the Biden administration, the latest blow to efforts from
> Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end the legal status.
>
> U.S. District Court Judge Brian Cogan ruled Noem could not issue a
> âpartial vacaturâ of a decision by her predecessor that gave Haitians
> Temporary Protected Status (TPS) until February of next year.
>
> In February, Noem signed an order seeking to advance that date, moving
> to end protections for Haitians this August.
>
> âPlaintiffsâ injuries far outweigh any harm to the Government from a
> postponement. Without a postponement, plaintiffs face the termination
> of Haitiâs TPS designation on September 2, 2025 and the subsequent
> loss of their legal right to live and work in the United States,
> despite this Courtâs finding that Secretary Noemâs partial vacatur of
> Haitiâs TPS designation was unlawful,â Cogan wrote."
>
> https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5381448-federal-judge-
> blocks-haiti-tps-end/
>
> Once again, you appear to think I don't come prepared for class.
Because in each of those cases, the judges didn't use nationwide
injunctions, but avenues that the USSC ruling explicitly left available.
So you really didn't prepare well at all, now did you?
:-)