From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Major win for Democracy!
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 16:02:17 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-04 09:02, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:55:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-07-03 06:40, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 21:54:59 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-07-02 18:49, Anonymous wrote:
>>>>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 00:35:03 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress never authorized lower federal courts to issue such nationwide
>>>>>>> injunctions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clue:Â It's a *federal* court.
>>>>>
>>>>> Clue: Lower federal courts are divided up into DISTRICTS, Governor Shill.
>>>>
>>>> And where in the statutes does it say that the cases they rule on ONLY
>>>> apply within those districts?
>>>
>>> See the most recent ruling from the Supreme Court for details.
>>
>> I'm responding to the claim by Anonymous that CONGRESS is responsible.
>
> Actually he said that Congress did not authorize the lower courts to
> issue nationwide injunctions. He is correct and the Supreme Court has
> ruled that this authority does not exist. Thus, any judge that rules
> this way is acting in a lawless fashion.
So you think that federal law should vary from district to district?