Davin News Server

Lost To Trump Czar Kamala Harris wrote:
> On 08 Jul 2025, rudy jon ball <klebatt@gmail.com> posted some
> news:RkcbQ.518216$9qCb.23393@fx15.iad:
> 
> The New York Times likes to think of itself as the “paper of record” or
> the gold standard of journalism. However, the Times, which has been
> controlled by the same family for more than a century, has a history of
> publishing lies and propagating false information relating to some of
> the most significant events in history.
> 
> Let’s go through five of the biggest lies published by the New York
> Times.
> 
> 5. The Hunter Biden Laptop
> Despite overwhelming evidence from the start that the documents, images,
> and recordings emanating from the Hunter Biden laptop were authentic,
> the Times initially refused to report on the scandal. When it became
> apparent, however, that the story was not going away, the newspaper
> published an article suggesting that the laptop, and its contents,
> should be disregarded since they were part of a disinformation campaign
> by the Russian government.
> 
> However, the data and documents on Hunter Biden's laptop were
> unquestionably of national importance and justified substantial coverage
> by the Times. In addition to a series of embarrassing photos and videos
> stored on the laptop, there were many emails from the device which
> pointed to sketchy business dealings between the Biden family and
> foreign operatives connected to the Chinese and Ukrainian governments.
> 
> According to polls, approximately 17% of Biden voters would have changed
> their vote had they been aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story. In
> essence, this concerted effort by the New York Times and others to
> initially suppress, and then reject, the laptop story unquestionably
> impacted the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
> 
> 4. Russian Collusion Hoax
> The New York Times was the chief disseminator of the Trump/Russian
> collusion hoax. The Times published a multitude of uncorroborated and
> false articles suggesting that Trump and the Russian government
> coordinated closely in the lead-up to the 2016 election.
> 
> As just one of many examples, in 2017, the Times published an article
> headlined “Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian
> Intelligence.” In that piece, the Times stated that Trump's 2016
> campaign had been in repeated contact with senior Russian intelligence
> officials during his presidential campaign. But that turned out to be
> false.
> 
> Incredibly, the Times refused to retract their reporting even after FBI
> officials (who, as we know, were no fans of President Trump) labeled the
> Times' Russian collusion reporting as “inaccurate” and “misleading.”
> 
> 3. Russian Bounties On US Soldiers
> In June of 2020, the New York Times published an article claiming that
> Russia had offered bounties to the Taliban to kill American troops
> stationed in Afghanistan.
> 
> The Times article further indicated that President Trump had been
> briefed on the Russian bounties plot but didn't take any action on that
> information (because, after all, Trump was a Russian asset, according to
> the Times). As it turned out, however, the Russian bounty story was as
> phony as the Russian collusion hoax.
> 
> The Russian bounties story was a major blunder by the Times and it could
> have resulted in grave consequences. Given NYT's influence and vast
> readership, it was extremely reckless for the paper to publish a bogus
> story alleging that Russia is paying terrorists to kill Americans.
> Because if that were true, it would potentially be grounds for a war
> between the world's two largest nuclear powers.
> 
> Apparently, galvanizing Americans towards a nuclear armageddon is a risk
> that the New York Times is willing to take so long as it makes the
> orange man look bad.
> 
> 2.  Weapons of Mass Destruction In Iraq
> In 2002, New York Times reporter Judith Miller wrote a series of
> articles, based on unnamed sources, claiming that Saddam Hussein
> “already had or was acquiring an arsenal of weapons of mass
> destruction.” However, as the world soon discovered, Hussein never
> possessed WMDs.
> 
> This is yet another instance in which a misleading story published by
> the Times had significant real-world implications. To this day, many
> consider the Times reporting on Saddam's non-existent "WMDs" to have
> played a major role in motivating the Bush administration to go to war
> in Iraq.
> 
> That war, of course, led to the deaths of over 4,000 American soldiers,
> and over 100,000 Iraqi civilians. In addition, the war pushed the United
> States deeper into debt and cost American taxpayers over $2 trillion.
> 
> Sadly, not much has changed over at the New York Times. Today, the
> “paper of record” seems to relish the role of being a cheerleader for
> increasing America's involvement in the Ukraine conflict with Russia.
> 
> 1. Whitewashing Genocide.
> The Times' deceptive coverage of the Holodomor genocide and the Nazi
> regime's atrocities are by far the most egregious examples of horrible
> journalism by the paper.
> 
> Holodomor Genocide
> By now it is readily evident that the Times has a poor track record
> reporting on Russia. Today, the paper portrays Russia as an evil puppet
> master responsible for seemingly everything that goes wrong in the
> world. But this wasn’t always the case.
> 
> Back when Russia was the central power within the Soviet Union, the New
> York Times often portrayed the nation in a favorable light. In the
> 1930s, Stalin deliberately engineered a famine to starve Ukrainians.
> This ended in the deaths of 4 million men, women and children. But the
> Times’ star reporter, Walter Duranty, essentially disseminated Soviet
> propaganda to Americans by denying that the famine was occuring. Had
> American’s not been misled by the Times' reporting, it would’ve almost
> certainly changed their view of the USSR. Instead, Americans, and even
> President Roosevelt, were bamboozled by Stalin, thanks in part to the
> Times portrayal of "Uncle Joe."
> 
> By the time Americans (and the rest of the free world) became attuned to
> the evil of the USSR, it was too late, as the Soviets had already taken
> control of governments around the world. Millions of people were driven
> into communist dictatorships following the end of World War 2. These
> poor souls would remain under communist control, for another
> half-century, until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989.
> 
> Coverage of Nazi Germany
> Similar to its depiction of Stalin, in the decade leading up to World
> War 2, the Times often published glowing portrayals of Hitler and
> downplayed the Nazi regime’s atrocities. The Times even employed a Nazi
> collaborator, Guido Enderis, to be its Bureau Chief in Berlin.
> 
> As Ashley Rindsberg documents in, The Gray Lady Winked, Enderiso
> presented news reports about Hitler and the Nazis in a favorable light
> to American readers back home. It’s not hard to imagine how many lives
> would have been saved if Americans had not been misled by the Times and
> were informed about Hitler’s brutality several years before World War 2
> began.
> 
> The Paper of Record?
> The fact is, if you had a friend or family member lie to you,
> repeatedly, for nearly a century about some of the world’s most
> significant events, you would never give them the benefit of the doubt
> or believe anything they say. It is time we hold the New York Times to
> that same standard.
> 
> Ashton Cohen is an attorney, investor, writer, and host of Ashton Cohen:
> The ELECTile Dysfunction Podcast.
> 
The New York Times said Clinton was a good good man for 3 yrs.

-- 


  vo^ vo^  C ü c k h a u s  ^ov ^ov