From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LOL... Lakehouse-Rich Boy Can't Do Math
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:23:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-15 21:11, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:58:01 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-07-14 19:20, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 00:17:36 -0400, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-07-12 23:56, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 12:38:28 -0700, Lou Bricano says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nine of the ten states with the lowest life expectancy are red shithole states,
>>>>>
>>>>> There are only "shithole" cities. The states are fine.
>>>
>>>> And yet the bluet states with blue cities do better.
>>>
>>> Not BIG Blue cities.
>
>> Overall.
>>
>> You claim that the OVERALL life expectancy in "red shithole states" are
>> only the lowest because of the "blue cities" within them.
>
> Yes!
>
> That's what I'm talking about.
>
> Comparing them to Blue-state blue-cities is irrelevant and has nothing to DO with why red-state's blue-cities and the "people" who
> inhabit them (not JUST in the city) are living shorter lives.
>
> It's the people. When I say "blue-cities", I'm talking about ALL of the Blue people too. THEY are the reason OVERALL that life-
> expectancy is lower in Red states.
>
> Take them out and what happens?
>
> Take them out of Blue-cities and states, and EVERYONE lives longer.
But if "blue cities" drag down life expectancies in states that are
otherwise red...
...why are states that are otherwise BLUE lower in life expectancy still?
Why do you run from answering that question, Phil?