From: Yak <Yak@inbox.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.politics,nz.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Film ICE At Work, Get Arrested
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 09:18:32 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 7/18/25 8:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105dfac$21rc3$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 7/17/25 10:13 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105bhlv$1fqem$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 7/17/25 2:21 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105at41$1ccfm$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/17/25 9:05 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105aot0$1bjln$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/16/25 8:53 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:13:12 -0400, Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Conservatives pretend to care about deficits.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, they don't. They just pretend they do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, they do. Problem is the 'they' that you are referring to are
>>> not
>>>>>>>> conservative (i.e. CINOs).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The No True Scotsman fallacy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that the best you can do?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the truth. That's all I need.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What would you know about truth?
>>>>
>>>> I know that you're incapable of telling it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "You want low prices. And you are now
>>>>> demanding the equivalent of migrant
>>>>> slaves, at below minimum wage provide
>>>>> it for you."
>>>>> Yak, July 9, 2025.
>>>>> In fact field workers make 3 times the
>>>>> minimum wage.
>>>>> https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Field-Work-Salary
>>>>
>>>> LOL...you're still running with this and still haven't figured out
>>> where
>>>> you're going wrong with it, huh? Let me give you a piece of advice -
>>>> read the site that you posted to.
>>>
>>>
>>> Unlike you I have done field work.
>>>
>>> It is manifestly awful. I admired the
>>> "wets" (local term) who did it and did it
>>> well. They worked at a pace that made
>>> decent money for them.
>>
>> Then, idiot, you should realize that the 'field work' that you linked
> to
>> is not crop/fruit picking field work.
>
>
> Huh?
>
> The cite proves you wrong,
The cite says *nothing* about field workers in the context of crop
pickers. Did you even read it?
> my
> personal experience proves you wrong,
Given your history here I call into question every last thing you claim.
> you are wrong, just admit it.
Nah, I got this one spot on correct. You need to admit you are comparing
two different kinds of 'field work.'
>
>
>> You're comparing two completely
>> separate things.
>>
>>
>>> Your "slave wages" rant is both wrong
>>> and stupid, you should apoglize for it.
>>
>> Boo hoo...cry me a river, snowflake. Since you aren't even comparing
> the
>> right kind of field work there's nothing to apologize for. You should
>> apologize for your continued desire for low prices on the back slave
> and
>> child labor.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>