Davin News Server

Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105e236$26e4o$1@dont-email.me:

> On 7/18/25 1:41 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105dhj9$22ejj$1@dont-email.me:
>> 
>>> On 7/18/25 8:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105dfac$21rc3$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/17/25 10:13 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105bhlv$1fqem$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/17/25 2:21 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105at41$1ccfm$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 7/17/25 9:05 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105aot0$1bjln$1@dont-
email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/25 8:53 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:13:12 -0400, Yak <Yak@inbox.com> 
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>           Conservatives pretend to care about deficits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, they don't.  They just pretend they do.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they do. Problem is the 'they' that you are referring to
>> are
>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> conservative (i.e. CINOs).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>          The No True Scotsman fallacy?
>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>          Is that the best you can do?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the truth. That's all I need.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>        What would you know about truth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know that you're incapable of telling it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You want low prices. And you are now
>>>>>>>> demanding the equivalent of migrant
>>>>>>>> slaves, at below minimum wage provide
>>>>>>>> it for you."
>>>>>>>> Yak, July 9, 2025.
>>>>>>>> In fact field workers make 3 times the
>>>>>>>> minimum wage.
>>>>>>>> https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Field-Work-Salary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL...you're still running with this and still haven't figured 
out
>>>>>> where
>>>>>>> you're going wrong with it, huh? Let me give you a piece of 
advice
>> -
>>>>>>> read the site that you posted to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        Unlike you I have done field work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        It is manifestly awful. I admired the
>>>>>> "wets" (local term) who did it and did it
>>>>>> well. They worked at a pace that made
>>>>>> decent money for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then, idiot, you should realize that the 'field work' that you 
linked
>>>> to
>>>>> is not crop/fruit picking field work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        Huh?
>>>>
>>>>        The cite proves you wrong,
>>>
>>> The cite says *nothing* about field workers in the context of crop
>>> pickers. Did you even read it?
>> 
>> 
>>      It says field workers. What do you
>> think field workers DO, if not pick crops
>> in the field?
> 
> If you could be bothered to even read the site that you posted to you 
> would see what a field worker does. As I previously said, the site you 
> are relying on makes no reference, nor bears any connection, to crop 
> pickers. Why don't you quit while you're behind and spare yourself any 
> further embarrassment?


    Your claim:


"you are now demanding the equivalent of migrant
slaves, at below minimum wage provide it for you."

    Post your proof. 

> 
>> 
>> 
>>>
>>>> my
>>>> personal experience proves you wrong,
>>>
>>> Given your history here I call into question every last thing you
>> claim.
>>>
>>>> you are wrong, just admit it.
>>>
>>> Nah, I got this one spot on correct. You need to admit you are
>> comparing
>>> two different kinds of 'field work.'
>> 
>> 
>>      What two kinds?
> 
> 1 - the kind that you claim to have taken part in.
> 2 - the kind described at the site that you clearly did not read; or, 
> for some inexplicable reason, don't understand.


      Your claim was about field work.

      My rebuttal was about field work.

      While claiming my proof is wrong
you have posted NONE showing that your
claim is RIGHT.