From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Sad - Liberals Need Their Illegal Votes So Desperately, They're Willing To Pile On EXTRA Murders, Rapes And Child Trafficking, JUST To Get Elected
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 06:00:33 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:24:47 -0400, -hh says...
> > Yeah, by Democrats, MOSTLY.
>
> Since these crime rates are higher in majority Red states...
BY the Blue, Black and Brown citizens.
Black men make up ~6% of the population, but commit 50-60% of the violent crime.
That is a FACT, and it IS supportable.
> > I guess you missed the part about murders, rapes and child trafficking,
> > being preventable by not having an open border. If they weren't let in,
> > there'd be that many LESS murders, rapes and child trafficking... right?
>
>
> Nope, for FBI crime statistics show lower per capita rates
There you go using that useless "rate" crap.
So, we should just pile on MORE crime, even though we can stop that crime from ever happening, but just closing the borders?
> of crimes by
> illegal immigrants than by US citizens. As such, if the US population
> were to be diluted with more immigrants, this suggests that the overall
> crime rates would go down, not up.
Useless "rate" bullshit. It would lead to MORE crime, not less, no matter the "rate".
A "lesser" rate, does not mean less crime, you fucking pedantic pussy idiot.
Tuscaloosa Alabama has a higher crime rate than Chicago. Does that mean there is more crime there?
Nope... Chicago has 700 murders... Tuscaloosa?
20.
Ask me to prove which is more dangerous. Hint: it has to do with time.
Alan "Lakehouse Rich" Baker couldn't understand it, so I'm thinking you won't, either. You'll just keep using useless "rate" stats
that never tell us how dangerous it is to live in certain places.
Are you Canadian too?
Take your rate crap and shove it. Lower rates does not mean a fucking thing, when dealing with the NUMBERS of crimes committed by
you Democrats.
There are parts of Chicago you can walk down the street at night and not worry, unless there are people from other parts of town
there, and there are those other parts that Chuck Norris wouldn't walk in, even if he had Rambo carrying a .50cal M2 with him.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."