From: Yak <Yak@inbox.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.politics,nz.politics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Film ICE At Work, Get Arrested
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:31:33 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 7/18/25 9:28 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105e236$26e4o$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 7/18/25 1:41 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105dhj9$22ejj$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 7/18/25 8:59 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105dfac$21rc3$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/17/25 10:13 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105bhlv$1fqem$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/17/25 2:21 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105at41$1ccfm$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/17/25 9:05 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Yak <Yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:105aot0$1bjln$1@dont-
> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/16/25 8:53 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:13:12 -0400, Yak <Yak@inbox.com>
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conservatives pretend to care about deficits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, they don't. They just pretend they do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they do. Problem is the 'they' that you are referring to
>>> are
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> conservative (i.e. CINOs).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The No True Scotsman fallacy?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the best you can do?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's the truth. That's all I need.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What would you know about truth?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know that you're incapable of telling it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "You want low prices. And you are now
>>>>>>>>> demanding the equivalent of migrant
>>>>>>>>> slaves, at below minimum wage provide
>>>>>>>>> it for you."
>>>>>>>>> Yak, July 9, 2025.
>>>>>>>>> In fact field workers make 3 times the
>>>>>>>>> minimum wage.
>>>>>>>>> https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Field-Work-Salary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL...you're still running with this and still haven't figured
> out
>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>> you're going wrong with it, huh? Let me give you a piece of
> advice
>>> -
>>>>>>>> read the site that you posted to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unlike you I have done field work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is manifestly awful. I admired the
>>>>>>> "wets" (local term) who did it and did it
>>>>>>> well. They worked at a pace that made
>>>>>>> decent money for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then, idiot, you should realize that the 'field work' that you
> linked
>>>>> to
>>>>>> is not crop/fruit picking field work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh?
>>>>>
>>>>> The cite proves you wrong,
>>>>
>>>> The cite says *nothing* about field workers in the context of crop
>>>> pickers. Did you even read it?
>>>
>>>
>>> It says field workers. What do you
>>> think field workers DO, if not pick crops
>>> in the field?
>>
>> If you could be bothered to even read the site that you posted to you
>> would see what a field worker does. As I previously said, the site you
>> are relying on makes no reference, nor bears any connection, to crop
>> pickers. Why don't you quit while you're behind and spare yourself any
>> further embarrassment?
>
>
> Your claim:
>
>
> "you are now demanding the equivalent of migrant
> slaves, at below minimum wage provide it for you."
>
> Post your proof.
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> my
>>>>> personal experience proves you wrong,
>>>>
>>>> Given your history here I call into question every last thing you
>>> claim.
>>>>
>>>>> you are wrong, just admit it.
>>>>
>>>> Nah, I got this one spot on correct. You need to admit you are
>>> comparing
>>>> two different kinds of 'field work.'
>>>
>>>
>>> What two kinds?
>>
>> 1 - the kind that you claim to have taken part in.
>> 2 - the kind described at the site that you clearly did not read; or,
>> for some inexplicable reason, don't understand.
>
>
> Your claim was about field work.
No, you first use the term 'field work.'
> My rebuttal was about field work.
And I corrected your comparing apples to oranges. I'm not letting you
cast blame on me for your error.
> While claiming my proof is wrong
> you have posted NONE showing that your
> claim is RIGHT.
Your own site debunks your faulty claim about just what field work is in
the context of this discussion. Stop already, you lost this one.
>
>
>
>