Davin News Server

On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:52:14 -0700,  Alan says...  

> 
> On 2025-07-20 04:22, AlleyCat wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 07:26:36 -0400,  Chris Ahlstrom says...
> > 
> >> Trump and Epstein shared "another wonderful secret".
> > 
> > So... after Trump kick Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago in 1997, he still
> > did things with Epstein?
> 
> You automatically believe that that happened because Trump told you so?

You automatically believe that that never happened because ONLY Trump told you so?
 
You're fucking ridiculous, rich boy. (see bottom)

You automatically believe that that never happened because no one else told you so?

You're a fucking pedantic little pussy, resorting to stupid questions like that, which are lies, because it's common knowledge.

You automatically believe that that never happened because someone other than Trump, never told you so?

Who said Trump's the only one with this information?

"Many have pointed to a PUBLIC FALLING-OUT in the early 2000s, claiming Trump 'kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for being a 
creep.'"

If it's PUBLIC, lake-house rich boy... OTHERS have told the story, but...

... you automatically believe that that never happened because someone else never told you so.

Gotcha.

You research EVERYTHING I write, so we all know you're lying, if you say it's only Trump's word.

> > 
> > You dumb fuck... "Epstein Island" wasn't even BOUGHT by Epstein
> > until later.

>  > > Epstein acquired Little Saint James Island in 1998. Reports and
> > unsealed documents indicate that celebrity and high-profile visits 
> > began to occur shortly after or around this time and continued
> > throughout the 2000s and into the 2010s, up until his arrests.
> 
> And you think that there was no illegal activity by Epstein and his 
> friends before he bought that island?

By Epstein and his friends?

WHY would I think that?

Why is everything you ask, a non-sequitur? What EXACTLY, made you think that *I* think that?

NO one SAID there was no "illegal activity" by "Epstein and his friends". Where did you get that from? Why do you always make shit 
up out of thin air to ask questions about? 
 
> Why?

Why are you such a pedantic little pussy faggot?

I don't know. Ask your parents, who, I'm guessing, are the rich fuck folks who made you into the narcissistic and ego-maniacal, and 
stalking pedantic pussy liar you are. Is that it? If not, they don't deserve you. I bet they don't even know what kind of weirdo 
you are.
 
> > 
> > Soooo... after Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago, it was all
> > huggy huggy and kissy kissy between them?
> > 
> > I don't think Trump's trying to protect himself.
> 
> Really?

Really, really. Trump's known about the "files" for how long now, and has never acted like he was protecting himself... why start 
now?

If Trump and/or anyone in his administration have access to these "files", why haven't any Democrats spilled the beans? If, as you 
say later in this post, Biden and/or HIS administration couldn't have access to the Epstein files, how can Trump or anyone in HIS 
administration have access to them, while NO Democrats do?

IS that your contention... that only REPUBLICANS can view these "files"?

Wouldn't that be illegal... letting Republicans ONLY have access to what's IN those files?

No... there's something more going on, than protecting Trump, which in my OPINION, is not what's happening.

YOU say later, that the files were "under strict federal court orders and that Federal judges controlled the records to protect the 
privacy of trafficking victims including minors". So... why can't THAT be a part of why they won't release them? I'm sure there are 
more they're protecting, than just "minors", so... IF it was Trump and he's trying to protect himself, why hasn't he tried to 
defend/protect himself before now?

If he's done something criminal, don't you think he would have been trying to DO something about the "files", like trying to get 
them PERMANENTLY sealed, while he was President and lobbying for that very thing when Biden was President, thinking THEY might try 
to release them?

It doesn't make sense, that he would be trying to protect himself, only now.
 
> Then what do you think he IS trying to do?

Protect the privacy of trafficking victims including minors (and others)?  
 
> > Did the Democrats EVER have access to the "Epstein files"?
> > 
> > They controlled the FBI for 4 years after Epstein was put away and
> > died, but during all that time, they had no idea what was in the 
> > files?
> 
> Unlike the current administration, the previous administration followed 
> the rule of law, and:

Riiiiiight. I bet NO one in Biden's administration saw them. Riiiiiight.

It's fucking bullshit, if you think no one in the Biden administration had access or didn't know what was in the files. THEY 
protected whomever the Trump administration is protecting now.

If Biden's FBI had control over the files, you KNOW (at least WE would, if you're too stupid not to) there would have been leaks or 
outright releases, JUST like the ones that said Trump traveled in one or more of Epstein's planes.

If there was "more" to that, they would have tried to crucify him with that information. And since they didn't HAVE that 
information, they just tried to kill him. 

> 'From 2021 through 2025 when Biden was president the Epstein files were 
> under strict federal court orders. Federal judges controlled the records 
> to protect the privacy of trafficking victims including minors. Biden 
> could not overrule those protections and no president can bypass federal 
> judges to release sealed court evidence to the public.'

So, why would anyone think Trump can now?

What changed?

Why hasn't it been taken to higher courts so Trump can't release anything, IF his administration has control over them now?

Trump's in the files... we all know that, but what exactly implicates him in any crimes?

We all know the time-lines. We all know Trump wasn't on the "Lolita Express", like Bill Gates and the various other Democrat donors 
and voters.

Assume all you want, lake-house rich, boy.

That makes Trump even LESS likely to be be guilty of any crimes. EVERYTHING you TDS sufferers ever say about Trump, ends up false 
and/or debunked, so... go ahead... accuse Trump of something illegal, that's from the Epstein Files.

Hell, the way you liberals and Democrats make shit up, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to jail him for LOOKING at someone not 
of age.

God help you liberals... you're losing everything, and have to make everything up that you accuse Trump of doing. It's really sad, 
you know... being a liberal or Democrat politician, and have people who believe your shit vote for them.

Same thing with illegal aliens.

So sad that they have to fight to keep FOREIGN CRIMINALS in the country, so they might win an election or two in the future.  

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."