Davin News Server

...  The "Musculoskeletal System" And The "Vascular And Circulatory Systems"

LOL  

=====

On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 11:04:41 -0700,  Alan says...  

> 
> On April 12, 2025, the White House published this:
> 
> 'Extremities/Musculoskeletal: His joints and muscles have a full range 
> of motion, with normal blood flow and no swelling.'
> 
> And then just three months later (July 17):

Lakehouse rich boy needs to learn the difference in "Musculoskeletal" and the "circulatory and vascular system".
 
Poor losing-side liberals... always conflating shit to make themselves feel good about all the losses they've taken lately.

> Which of you thinks that you can go from no signs that a doctor can see of CVI (Chronic Venous Insufficiency) to obviously
> swollen ankles in just 3 months? 

Swollen ankles are NOT a sign of any degenerative musculoskeletal problem. That's circulatory. Show us how you're NOT conflating 
two different systems of the human body.

Short of an injury, arthritis, tendinitis[1] and an infection... less than perfect blood flow is usually the culprit in swollen 
ankles.

> 'The President underwent a comprehensive examination, including 
> diagnostic VASCULAR studies. Bilateral lower extremity venous Doppler 
> ultrasounds were performed and revealed chronic venous insufficiency, a 
> benign and common condition, particularly in individuals over the age of
> 70.'

LOL... you stupid fuck... "chronic venous insufficiency" doesn't limit range of motion, unless your extremities are swollen beyond 
normal. If Trump's ankles swell up enough to limit movement, he probably need a bypass or two. But, that's not the case, is it?

Poor TDS sufferer.

He's 70... a little "chronic venous insufficiency" is all too common a condition.

Guess what?

He's still President and there ain't a thing your whining ass can do about it.

[1] "Tendinitis" is also correct and is sometimes considered the more "medically precise" spelling, as the suffix "-itis" 
specifically denotes inflammation.

Perfect TDS sufferer.

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a 
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in 
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."

Added Krauthammer:

"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get their news from one part of the political spectrum - the 
gravest of all. They report that no matter how many times sufferers in padded cells are presented with flash cards with the symbols 
ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Time, Newsweek, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain unresponsive, some 
in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."

(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part - meant in a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may well 
have it.)

Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear Politics 
in early 2017:

"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump to Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it. Articles in 
respectable publications written by professors at elite universities are warning us to be on guard, that a Trump presidency could 
imperil democracy-as-we-know-it and may very well spell doom for American civilization.

"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was about to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited. Many 
more threatened to leave the country, but I'm pretty sure none actually did. As Donald Trump might say in a tweet: so sad!"

The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as 
nothing more than the blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and free speech. Viewed more broadly, the rise of presidential 
derangement syndromes is a function of increased polarization - not to mention our national self-sorting - at work in the country 
today.

We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who think any differently than us. We watch cable news that affirms 
what we already think. We read ideological "news" sites that tell us how good our side is and how bad the other one is. And on and 
on and on.

Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who disagree with us into the "deranged" category? To say that 
those who don't share our views are mentally deficient in some way?

What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the standard response to those with whom you disagree is that they 
must be crazy? Nothing good, for sure. 

=====

Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have speculated upon the mental health of President Donald 
Trump. Indeed, over 70,000 people self-identifying as "mental health professionals" have signed a petition declaring that "Trump is 
mentally ill and must be removed." In sociological terms, the "medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on President Trump, and to a 
lesser extent his ardent supporters.

However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of this "medical gaze." In fact, more and more people are 
suggesting that this "medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused on President Trump's most embittered and partisan opponents. 
Some have even suggested that these opponents are experiencing a specific mental condition-a condition which has been labelled 
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?

Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) known as 
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). This book contains 947 pages and lists hundreds 
of mental disorders; TDS is nowhere to be seen. Similarly, a review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE and Google Scholar 
reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome. Officially at least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable, or treatable mental 
disorder.

That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have convincingly argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document. Indeed, 
social scientists have long recognized that there are numerous "folk categories" of mental disorders that are considered real 
conditions by the general public, even though they are not recognized as such in the DSM. These include categories such as 
"burnout" or "nervous breakdown."

As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a real mental condition.


Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"

There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk category rather than a professional category. As such, 
there is currently much armchair speculation about the nature and existence of TDS, without consensus.

The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome," which the Oxford English Dictionary defines as "a characteristic combination of 
opinions, emotions, or behavior." Several commentators have run with this, putting forth suggestions about opinions, emotions and 
behaviors characterizing TDS.

Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of President Trump trigger some people into distorted opinions, 
extreme emotions and hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer Bernard Goldberg gives supposed behavioral examples of TDS among 
Trump's political opponents, including fainting, vomiting, students retreating to "safe spaces" and others demanding "therapy 
dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses on opinions, language and cognition, writing in the LA Times that "sufferers 
speak a distinctive language consisting of hyperbole [leading to] a constant state of hysteria... the afflicted lose touch with 
reality."

Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the fainting and screaming characterizing American Beatlemania 
in the 1960s. Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme emotional reaction alleged to characterize TDS is not based on adoration and 
admiration, but on fear and loathing.

Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a malicious slur term used to discredit and delegitimize 
criticism of President Trump. For example, CNN's Chris Cillizza may speak for many when he stated: "The truth is that TDS is just 
the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than blind hatred." 
Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem is not TDS; our problem is Deranged Trump Self-Delusion."

In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality and existence of TDS.


Conclusion

The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists spend considerable time and energy behind closed doors 
pondering over the existence and reality of mental conditions. This has led the APA to revise the DSM five times since 1952, 
considerably expanding the list of official mental disorders with each revision. As far as I am aware, few psychiatrists are 
currently arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental disorder.

That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5 states that "a mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by 
clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior... mental disorders are usually 
associated with significant distress in social, occupational, or other important activities."

Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and distressed by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets of 
President Trump, so much so that it has affected their cognitive, affective, and behavioral functioning. Such people may need 
mental health support. As such, further research is necessary to investigate the extreme reactions toward President Trump, in the 
same way that researchers investigate other extreme social phenomena, such as Beatlemania or the like. This will shed light on the 
reality of this emerging folk category that has been labelled by many as "Trump Derangement Syndrome."