Davin News Server

On 2025-07-29 17:01, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-07-29, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-07-29 15:39, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-07-29, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-07-29 15:17, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-07-29, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-07-29 14:18, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-07-29, Ken <Ken@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-29 10:48, Ken wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28 14:32, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28 13:40, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28 10:51, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-28, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for farmers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's better than spending the money on programs for countries
>>>>>>>>>>>> who hate us and want us dead.
>>>>>>>>>>> Which countries are those? It's not actually a long list.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It does not matter if it is a long list or short list.  This country
>>>>>>>>>> is in debt to the tune of 36 Trillion dollars.  Not a dime should be
>>>>>>>>>> sent to someone who is not a friend.  Do you donate to organizations
>>>>>>>>>> that you dislike??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But you don't mind that Trump's tax cuts for the rich are running up
>>>>>>>>> that debt, so your complaint comes out a little bit bullshit, doesn't it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So just because someone receives funds that you disagree with, other
>>>>>>>> wasted funds should continue??  Do you handle your personal finances
>>>>>>>> that way??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will close with this:  Everyday the polls show the liberal criticism
>>>>>>>> of Trump to be believed even less.  Those of you with TDS should more
>>>>>>>> carefully choose your issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good post.
>>>>>>> I still haven't seen this so called tax benefits for the rich data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wouldn't consider no taxes on tips, overtime and additional bonus added
>>>>>>> for seniors on SS increased SALT deduction. something the rich are interested in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ChatGPT: 'Did Trump really eliminate taxes on tips?'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Final Take: Did Trump “Eliminate Taxes on Tips”?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not entirely. What changed was:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A limited, temporary federal income tax deduction for up to $25,000 in
>>>>>> cash tip income.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still subject to payroll and other taxes, with income-based phase‑outs
>>>>>> and an expiration in 2028.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So it isn't "no taxes on tips".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ChatGPT: 'Did Trump eliminate tax on overtime?'
>>>>>>
>>>>> ChatGPT?
>>>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>>>
>>>>> You lose.
>>>> You get that you get the sources when you do that kind of search, right?
>>>>
>>>> Let me demonstrate:
>>>>
>>>> 'A limited, temporary federal income tax deduction for up to $25,000 in
>>>> cash tip income.'
>>>>
>>>> How's the IRS for a source?
>>>>
>>>> 'Maximum annual deduction is $25,000'
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-tax-deductions-for-working-americans-and-seniors>
>>>>
>>>> Good enough?
>>>
>>> $25k in tips is a lot of money.
>>> So......
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>> There are so many factors involved.
>>> Single vs married vs head of house, medical issues, SALT and a gazillion more.
>>
>> So having implied that the results from ChatGPT were wrong, you now
>> shift the goalposts.
> 
> No.
> I'm saying that a simple prompt like you created does not tell the entire
> story.
> It's far too complex.

And I'm asking you in what particulars was the answer that it provided 
inaccurate.

And you're running away just as fast as you can.