From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: "Bat poop crazy"
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 17:17:43 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-29 17:05, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-07-29, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 7/29/25 17:20, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-07-29, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>> chine.bleu wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>> Same for solar panels which can be incorporated into the architecture so
>>>>>>>> less of an eyesore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because oil wells aren't just as unsightly? While also being
>>>>>>> significantly worse environmentally too (how many abandoned wells are
>>>>>>> uncapped & still polluting?)
>>>>>>>> Again, let the market decide.
>>>>>>> The Market already is; Texas is a good example in particular:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "This year through June, solar and wind have generated 40.2% of the
>>>>>>> electricity demand in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
>>>>>>> grid region"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> California banned solar panels in coastal waters after electricity spill
>>>>>> off Santa Barbara fouled all the beaches.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-D :-D :-D
>>>>> :-D :-D
>>>>> :-D :-D :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> Still better to be electrocuted than eaten by a shark! :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> Another batshit-crazy Republican:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No boats were harmed making this post.
>>>
>>> Solar panels are highly toxic.
>>
>> So is chugging a quart of 10W-40.
>>
>>
>> -hh
>
> Couldn't tell ya because my car takes 5W-30 full synthetic.
> And I drop it off and it gets recycled.
>
> Can the same be said of solar panels?
> Currently 90% plus end up in landfills.
Cite, please!