From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: "Bat poop crazy"
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 23:13:00 -0400
Organization: Victor Usenet Postings
-hh wrote:
> On 7/29/25 17:20, pothead wrote:
>> On 2025-07-29, chine.bleu <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>> chine.bleu wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>>>
>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>> Same for solar panels which can be incorporated into the architecture so
>>>>>>> less of an eyesore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because oil wells aren't just as unsightly? While also being
>>>>>> significantly worse environmentally too (how many abandoned wells are
>>>>>> uncapped & still polluting?)
>>>>>>> Again, let the market decide.
>>>>>> The Market already is; Texas is a good example in particular:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "This year through June, solar and wind have generated 40.2% of the
>>>>>> electricity demand in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
>>>>>> grid region"
>>>>>
>>>>> California banned solar panels in coastal waters after electricity spill
>>>>> off Santa Barbara fouled all the beaches.
>>>>
>>>> :-DÂ Â Â :-DÂ Â Â :-D
>>>> Â Â Â Â Â :-DÂ Â :-D
>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â :-D :-D :-D
>>>>
>>>> Still better to be electrocuted than eaten by a shark! :-D
>>>>
>>>> Another batshit-crazy Republican:
>>>>
>>>
>>> No boats were harmed making this post.
>>
>> Solar panels are highly toxic.
>
> So is chugging a quart of 10W-40.
Nobody does that. Some people, however, DO dump the waste products from
manufacturing solar panels directly into the environment.