From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Lay Your Hands on an ICE Officer After Filming ICE LEGALLY
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 09:21:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-30 07:41, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-07-30, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:07:54 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>> <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-07-29, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 14:01:28 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Yet denial of due process is just fine when used against immigrants or
>>>>>> Democrats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Illegals yes.
>>>>> Come back legally next time.
>>>>
>>>> Illegals are covered under the 14th amendment.
>>>
>>> This is an invasion we are dealing with and I prefer to protect the
>>> legal citizens of the US over criminals who jumped the border.
>>>
>>> <https://www.breitbart.com/border/2025/07/28/200-illegal-alien-child-sex-offenders-arrested-in-houston-in-six-months/>
>>
>> All I'm insisting on is due process being followed. Arbitrary arrest
>> and deportation are illegal.
>>
>> Period.
>
> All I am insisting on is to enter the country legally and apply
> legally for citizenship.
> You know, like we have for a very long time.
> Borders are there for a reason and should be protected and laws enforced.
> We just can't let anyone into the country without proper vetting especially
> in these current terrorist infested times.
>
>
>>
>> "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
>> privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall
>> any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without
>> due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the
>> equal protection of the laws."
>
> Where is the due process when the migrants enter the country illegally?
So any time anyone is accused (note "accused") of a crime they can be
denied due process based on an assumption (note "assumption") of their
guilt?
Is that what you're advocating for?