From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Lay Your Hands on an ICE Officer After Filming ICE LEGALLY
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:43:47 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-31 08:59, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-07-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 7/30/25 10:41, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-07-30, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:07:54 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>>>> <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-07-29, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 14:01:28 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet denial of due process is just fine when used against immigrants or
>>>>>>>> Democrats.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Illegals yes.
>>>>>>> Come back legally next time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Illegals are covered under the 14th amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is an invasion we are dealing with and I prefer to protect the
>>>>> legal citizens of the US over criminals who jumped the border.
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.breitbart.com/border/2025/07/28/200-illegal-alien-child-sex-offenders-arrested-in-houston-in-six-months/>
>>>>
>>>> All I'm insisting on is due process being followed. Arbitrary arrest
>>>> and deportation are illegal.
>>>>
>>>> Period.
>>>
>>> All I am insisting on is to enter the country legally and apply
>>> legally for citizenship.
>>
>> Many have ... and CBP is grabbing them while they're still undergoing
>> those due process legal processes. Is this acceptable to you?
>>
>> -hh
>
> It depends.
> Does the person in question have some kind of criminal background?
> If not, let the hearing already in progress proceed.
> If yes, back to the country of origin.
So once again: "some kind of criminal background"?
What do you mean by that?
>
> That being said, this may come as a surprise to you but I voted for Trump
> based upon him closing the border which he effectively has done and deporting
> illegals starting with the dangerous ones first which AFAIK he is doing
> however there are too many casualties of war, IOW families, hard working
> people with no criminal history and such being caught up in the raids.
Almost like you were lied to...
>
> I do not support that which is why my opinion has always been that the DACA
> people who stayed out of trouble, not leeching on the system, should be granted
> citizenship first.
>
> I realize that we need a level set which requires drastic actions,
> however I don't support the current methods 100%.