From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Lay Your Hands on an ICE Officer After Filming ICE LEGALLY
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:59:42 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-07-31 12:55, -hh wrote:
> On 7/31/25 15:43, Alan wrote:
>> On 2025-07-31 08:59, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-07-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/30/25 10:41, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-07-30, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:07:54 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>>>>>> <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-07-29, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 14:01:28 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yet denial of due process is just fine when used against
>>>>>>>>>> immigrants or
>>>>>>>>>> Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Illegals yes.
>>>>>>>>> Come back legally next time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Illegals are covered under the 14th amendment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is an invasion we are dealing with and I prefer to protect the
>>>>>>> legal citizens of the US over criminals who jumped the border.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.breitbart.com/border/2025/07/28/200-illegal-alien-
>>>>>>> child-sex-offenders-arrested-in-houston-in-six-months/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All I'm insisting on is due process being followed. Arbitrary arrest
>>>>>> and deportation are illegal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>
>>>>> All I am insisting on is to enter the country legally and apply
>>>>> legally for citizenship.
>>>>
>>>> Many have ... and CBP is grabbing them while they're still undergoing
>>>> those due process legal processes. Is this acceptable to you?
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> It depends.
>
> Not according to the 14th Amendment, it doesn't.
>
>>> Does the person in question have some kind of criminal background?
>>> If not, let the hearing already in progress proceed.
>>> If yes, back to the country of origin.
>>
>> So once again: "some kind of criminal background"?
>>
>> What do you mean by that?
> The whistle that they're making is that all improper border crossings
> are 'illegal' and therefore nothing less than 'criminal', thereby giving
> them their belief that they can ignore the Constitutional mandates for
> due process for all.
And there's a subtle (not really that subtle) tacit racism that...
...of course they (ICE) can tell just by looking that someone improperly
crossed the border.