From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: The Daily Beast falls flat on its face...again
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 11:41:59 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-08-03 06:18, NoBody wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:38:41 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-08-02 10:58, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thursday, The Daily Beast removed an article from its website that
>>> highlighted claims that President Donald Trump met first lady Melania
>>> Trump through Jeffrey Epstein. These claims came from Trump biographer
>>> Michael Wolff.
>>>
>>> This editorâs note was posted on The Daily Beastâs site: âEditorâs
>>> Note. After this story was published, The Beast received a letter from
>>> First Lady Melania Trumpâs attorney challenging the headline and
>>> framing of the article. After reviewing the matter, the Beast has
>>> taken down the article and apologizes for any confusion or
>>> misunderstanding.â
>>>
>>> Wolffâs original claims were made during an episode of âThe Daily
>>> Beast Podcast,â which aired six days ago.
>>>
>>> TheWrapâs Benjamin Lindsay wrote, âIn the podcast interview with
>>> Joanna Coles, published Saturday, Wolff alleges that Donald and
>>> Melania met in 1998 through ID Models founder Paolo Zampolli, who
>>> himself had ties to Epstein and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell. He said
>>> that Melania was âvery involvedâ in Epsteinâs social circle.â
>>>
>>> A spokesperson for The Daily Beast told media journalist Oliver Darcy,
>>> âThe story was deleted because it did not reflect the comments made by
>>> Michael Wolff and Joanna Coles on the Daily Beast podcast.â
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2025/the-daily-beast-retracts-melania-epstein-story/
>>>
>>> Translation: They got caught flat out lying.
>>
>> What does Fox do when they get caught lying?
>>
>
> Do try to stick to the topic.
I'm making a comparison...
...just the same way you like to do.
:-)
>
>> Maybe the fact that they were wiling to own up and apologize when they
>> made a MISTAKE is the reason YOUR source says:
>
> How is it a mistake to publish something that was never said as fact?
>
>>
>> 'The Daily Beast is a superb site'
>>
>> :-)
>
> Laughter!
It's YOUR SOURCE sunshine.