From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: The Daily Beast falls flat on its face...again
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 07:08:01 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Sun, 3 Aug 2025 11:41:59 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-08-03 06:18, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:38:41 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-08-02 10:58, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, The Daily Beast removed an article from its website that
>>>> highlighted claims that President Donald Trump met first lady Melania
>>>> Trump through Jeffrey Epstein. These claims came from Trump biographer
>>>> Michael Wolff.
>>>>
>>>> This editors note was posted on The Daily Beasts site: Editors
>>>> Note. After this story was published, The Beast received a letter from
>>>> First Lady Melania Trumps attorney challenging the headline and
>>>> framing of the article. After reviewing the matter, the Beast has
>>>> taken down the article and apologizes for any confusion or
>>>> misunderstanding.
>>>>
>>>> Wolffs original claims were made during an episode of The Daily
>>>> Beast Podcast, which aired six days ago.
>>>>
>>>> TheWraps Benjamin Lindsay wrote, In the podcast interview with
>>>> Joanna Coles, published Saturday, Wolff alleges that Donald and
>>>> Melania met in 1998 through ID Models founder Paolo Zampolli, who
>>>> himself had ties to Epstein and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell. He said
>>>> that Melania was very involved in Epsteins social circle.
>>>>
>>>> A spokesperson for The Daily Beast told media journalist Oliver Darcy,
>>>> The story was deleted because it did not reflect the comments made by
>>>> Michael Wolff and Joanna Coles on the Daily Beast podcast.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2025/the-daily-beast-retracts-melania-epstein-story/
>>>>
>>>> Translation: They got caught flat out lying.
>>>
>>> What does Fox do when they get caught lying?
>>>
>>
>> Do try to stick to the topic.
>
>I'm making a comparison...
>
>...just the same way you like to do.
>
Ok what stories did Fox News put out that quoted people as saying
things that were never said?
>:-)
>
>>
>>> Maybe the fact that they were wiling to own up and apologize when they
>>> made a MISTAKE is the reason YOUR source says:
>>
>> How is it a mistake to publish something that was never said as fact?
>>
>>>
>>> 'The Daily Beast is a superb site'
>>>
>>> :-)
>>
>> Laughter!
>
>It's YOUR SOURCE sunshine.
Actually it wasn't but I understand your confusion.
Laughter...