From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: "Bat poop crazy"
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 19:29:15 -0400
On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:23:00 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
>On 2025-08-08, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 23:35:03 -0600, Gronk wrote:
>>>Gronk wrote:
>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-07-28, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Doing an interview in Scotland about how "bad" wind turbines are (he
>>>>>> called them "windmills", but never mind)...
>>>>>> ...where they quite successfully get 40% of their electricity from wind
>>>>>> turbines.
>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7pa-EvdMqA>
>>>>> They are horrible.
>>>>> Where I live whales are washing up on the beaches in numbers never
>>>>> seen before.
>>>> Really? Evidence? Cite? Article? No?
>>>"Where I live whales are washing up on the beaches
>>>in numbers never seen before. "
>>>Still no evidence...
>> I've asked him for it too but didn't get any. The windmill killing
>> whales is from the same delusionary school of consipirakookness that
>> supports windmills causing cancer and Oswald was a patsy for LBJ's
>> assassination of Kennedy.
>
>Cancer?
>I doubt that but what amount of EMF do these things emit?
As much as a coal plant? A hydropower station? Thousands of miles of
high tension wires?
Every form of commercial electrical generation is about turning
magnets in a coil to generate electricity. Whether it's wind, water
or steam is irrelevant. Wind powered generators don't inherently emit
more EM energy than hydro or steam powered ones.
And, btw, being out at sea, that EM energy is less relevant to humans
than living in the vicinity of a major hydro dam or coal power plant
and do less environmental damage.
>There might be more to the Oswald story than we have been told.
>Will we ever know for sure?
>Probably not.
>Does it matter?
>Nope.
WHOOOOOSH!
>I think the turbine situation needs to be studied further though.
C-above. Coal (steam), nuke (steam), hydro, commercial solar, wind,
all of them are about spinning that turbine generator. ALL of them.
>As for whale washing up dead in my neck of the woods, the current theory
>is there are more whales around these parts than in previous times
>because they come here to feed on smaller fish.
>More whales = more dead whales due to disease, collisions with boats
>and so forth.
>
>That makes the most sense to me because in recent years I have noticed
>the tourist boats that cater to whale watching have ramped up in business.
So you've abandoned your suggestion that wind turbines at sea are
killing whales "in numbers never seen before?"
>I dunno except I find the turbines ugly looking
I find them graceful and beautiful if not as charming or quaint as a
Dutch fabric and wood one from, oh, say, the sixteenth century.
>and all things considered
>what are the actual numbers regarding cost, maintenance, life span, environmental considerations
>vs return?
Readily available all over the internet. If you were really
interested, you would have found them already.
Btw, does your common sense not inform you that windmills do less
environmental damage than a series of hydropower dams along a river?
For example, how much damage has there been in the Tennessee Valley or
along the Colorado due to hydropower dams?
--
Superman is an illegal immigrant!
8647