From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: So Much Written... So Little Said
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 18:42:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-08-14 18:21, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 10:29:23 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>>> Since you've provide absolutely nothing on the supposed cost
>>>> of operating a Joby eVTOL aircraft (whatever the production
>>>> version-- now in production--ends up being named)....
>>>
> Moot.
>>>
>>> I provided cost to consumers, which will probably be higher than
>>> what I posted.
>
> You provided wild ass guess.
>
> Prove it. YOU show us projected charges per flight per person.
No. YOU get to prove that you had more than a wild ass guess.
>
>>> If you wanna whine about me not citing my figures, it's rather
>>> easy to look them up... even for a fucktard Cuntnadian liberal,
>>> such as yourself.
>
>> But if I look them up, you'll just claim you looked up different
>> figures.
>
> Well, for one thing, they're trying to be as close to what they will
> be now... not in the future, which will probably be higher than
> anything you find.
>
> MY source said they WILL probably be higher by the time they get
> certified and flying.
>
> Not too many sources EVER have the exact figures on things like
> this, mainly because nothing has come to fruition, so OF COURSE,
> dumb ass... while not "guesses" per se, nothing's written in
> concrete.
>
> Joby probably won't quote their pricing, because they'll always be
> subject to change, but the prices I provided are not "wild-ass"
> guesses, no matter what YOU say.
So if "Joby probably won't quote their pricing"...
...how is it you can claim you know it would be higher?
>
> YOU are not an expert. I've read just as much on this shit as you.
>
>> YOU claim they exist.
>
> Projected costs? Jes. What, exactly is "wrong" about that? Anything
> YOU find will be the same... projections.
>
>> YOU present your sources.
>
> I already did.