From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Hillary Clinton STILL Denying She Lost In 2016
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 15:58:22 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
I would feel sad for this dilapidated hag, if she had a single redeeming quality.
But, of course, she doesn't.
Hillary is still lamenting that her loss to Trump in 2016 wasn't legitimate:
"He lost legitimately in 2020.(lie) He won in 2024. It was much more unclear in 2016, for all the reasons why we still litigate
that election."
Litigating an election she conceded?
The Mother of the Russia Hoax narrative/coup that sought to undermine the will of the electorate and the Trump first term goes on
to suggest Trump may stage an "insurrection" to stay in power:
"I believe that he's got his, you know, little team working at the Heritage Foundation or wherever they work these days, to try to
figure out how he can. Well, declaring an insurrection is certainly, you know, a tried and true, tactic of authoritarians."
Yet ANOTHER TDS sufferer:
"So, you can't have a one and done election. In other words, somebody does get legitimately elected as he was, he lost legitimately
in 2020. He won in 2024. Uh, it was much more unclear in 2016 for all the reasons why we still litigate that election, but
nevertheless, he won in 2024. He has no constitutional right, no legal basis to run again. Do I believe that he's got his, you
know, little team working at the Heritage Foundation or wherever they work these days, uh, to try to figure out how he can, well,
declaring an insurrection is certainly, you know, a tried and true a tactic of authoritarians. So I don't think we're out of the
woods on being able to hold free and fair elections in 2026 despite their efforts to literally change the playing field with these
last minute gerrymandering decisions. And I sure don't think we're out of danger that Trump will try to seize power even more than
he already has in order to justify a run in 2028."
What a fucking delusional cunt.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was a
punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in
reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."