Davin News Server

From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Where Was Midget's Feigned Anger When...
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:07:14 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 8/20/25 21:22, AlleyCat wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:16:12 -0400,  -hh says...
> 
>>> So . . . you penalize a country that sells you too much stuff.  Then
>>> you penalize them for not selling you enough stuff?
>>> <snip>
>>
>> Still waiting for the justification for Trump's Tariff on Penguins...
> 
> This has already been explained to you, through this group. I can't help it if you missed it.

Oh, I already know the explanation:  the "geniuses" who originally put 
together the list used AI to generate countries, which used the domain 
registry list instead of actual real countries.  That's how they got an 
uninhabited island.

Now MAGAs did try to spin a defense by postulating that countries could 
dodge tariffs by passing goods through that remote destination.  The 
problem with this narrative attempt is that it doesn't work, because 
tariffs are based on origin.  Examples have already been noted on 
Vietnam exports which have high China content levels.


> This has already been explain to you and the others, pretending to be 
> economically stupid. If you don't tariff those you have a trade surplus 
> with, or tariff them with a very low number, or not at all, countries 
> that ARE tariffed higher, will simply sell their goods to THOSE countries 
> and go around paying America the tariffs.

So is this word salad simply trying to own what I wrote above?  Or is it 
trying to claim (incorrectly BTW) that trade imbalances are supposed to 
be equalized through tariffs?



> (I know it's the importers who actually pay the tariffs, but there's nothing 
> to prevent them from countries, like China, from selling to the Penguin Islands 
> and the importers buying from them)

Except that this strategy doesn't work:  trying to cheat the system via 
third party transshipment requires obtaining a fraudulent certificate of 
origin, by unloading/reloading cargo in that country.  One can't do that 
with an uninhabited island which lacks a port.


> Remember the idiots who cried when Trump tariffed the Penguin Islands?
> 
> "If you leave (any countries) off the list, countries that try to basically 
> arbitrage America, will go through those (countries) to us." - Howard Lutnick

Lutnick is wrong & lying to you because the world is already savvy to 
the ways to cheat; see above for a specific debunking.

The legal method to change country of origin requires a significant 
enough value-added step to the goods called "substantial ransformation". 
Its a (significant enough) value-added step to the product, such as by 
smelting ore into that metal, making raw cotton into cloth, or to make 
cloth into clothing.


-hh