Davin News Server

From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Michael John Bolton's home raided.
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:15:44 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 11:56:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>On 2025-08-24 07:12, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:32:01 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2025-08-23 06:31, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:33:01 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-08-22 10:59, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> Delicious irony!
>>>>>
>>>>> Really?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did he really do anything wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Laughter!
>>>>
>>>> Did you protest when Trump's house was raided?
>>>
>>> Nope. There was probable cause. Trump admitted as much.
>> 
>> You have evidence there was no probable cause for Michael-John's raid?
>> 
>> Hypocrisy much.
>
>Not at all.

Laughter!

>
>It's not my job to present the evidence.

Laughter!

>
>The search warrant for Mar-a-Lago is public record.

Was it public record immediately after the raid?

>
>Where is the one for Bolton?

Stomp your feet some more.
All in due time - if the media bothers to cover it.


Just
>
>> 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "FBI agents raided the Maryland home of former National Security
>>>> Advisor John Bolton on Friday morning, Fox News Digital has learned.
>>>>
>>>> Fox News Digital later spotted agents at Bolton's Washington, D.C.,
>>>> office removing boxes and Bolton was seen in the lobby of the
>>>> building.
>>>>
>>>> The searches are focused on potential classified documents agents
>>>> believe Bolton may still possess, according to one source. "
>>>>
>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/john-boltons-home-raided-federal-agents-sources-say
>>>>
>>>> We shall see if he did anything wrong.
>>>
>>> OK. So the FBI can raid your home next to "see if you did anything wrong".
>>>
>> 
>> It appears they did just that for Trump and you actually doubled down
>> on this.
>
>Nope. They already KNEW that he had failed to returned documents.

AND permitted him to retain them.
How does that work exactly?

>
>> 
>> In anticipation of your next stupid statement I'll ask if Trump was
>> found guilty of having classified documents.
>
>Nope.

Then he committed no crime.

>
>But he had a friendly judge, whom he had appointed overseeing the case.

Laughter!
As opposed to judges who hated him.
I see what your definition of "fairness" is.

You're a hypocrite, plain and simple.