Davin News Server

From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: WHY Did Trump Put The Guard In DC?
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:27:03 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:19:55 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>On 2025-08-24 07:16, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 21:40:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2025-08-23 20:25, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 09:25:12 -0700,  Alan says...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-08-23 06:36, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:32:15 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DC Police crime figures:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carjackings:		Down 83%
>>>>>>> Robbery:		Down 46%
>>>>>>> Car thefts:		Down 21%
>>>>>>> Violent crime:	Down 22%
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since Trump surged police and national guard in Washington: DC has gone a week without a murder, the first time in a summer that
>>>>>>> has occurred on record. Carjackings are down 83% and robberies are down nearly half. Pretty incredible crime results already:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://x.com/i/status/1958519301662548050
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =====
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leavitt Admits DC Crime Figures "Reconfigured" To Show The TRUTH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Dems refused to enforce the law and caused this response.  Now
>>>>>> they whine about the response.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that really what happened?
>>>>
>>>> Jes.
>>>>    
>>>>> What's your proof?
>>>>
>>>> The rise in crime, you fucking moron.
>>>>
>>>> Good thing Trump's our President. YOU just don't worry about DC... YOU have enough problems in Vancouver.
>>>>
>>>> And don't tell me crime's down... "down" does NOT mean under control.
>>>
>>> Good thing you always believe Trump, right?
>>>
>>> What happened to "all politicians lie"?
>> 
>> So post a news story that show that he's wrong.
>> 
>> WELL????
>
>Post a news story showing the original crime figures that Trump claimed 
>were wrong...
>
>...were wrong.
>
>Do you see how that works?

You've already shown that having correct data provided to you is
pointless as you just run away from it.

Happened in this same thread.