From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Background on the Michael-John Bolton affair
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> Interesting reading.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> " At the center of the Justice Departmentâs reopened probe of John
>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumpâs former national security
>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
>>>>>
>>>>> A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
>>>>>
>>>>> The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
>>>>>
>>>>> The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
>>>>>
>>>>> CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
>>>>> FBI emails. "
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
>>>>> investigation
>>>>
>>>> And 4 year long investigation found...
>>>>
>>>> ...what?
>>>
>>> The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
>>>
>>> Duh.
>>
>> Of course!
>>
>> The deep state!
>>
>> LOL!
>
> CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
> cited
>
> Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?